AGAIN…
MUST WATCH
13 21 19 20 0 23 1 20 3 8 >128
Nov 09, 2017 11:07:15 PM EST128
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: Dx5TPc5d No. 148779656
1510280445405.jpg
Trip added.
[C]oordinated effort to misdirect.
Guide to reading the crumbs necessary to cont[I]nue.
Attached gr[A]phic is correct.
Linked graphics are incorrect and false.
Graphic is necessary and vital.
Time stamp(s) and order [is] critical.
Re-review graphic (in full) each day post news release.
Learn to distinguish between relevant/non-relevant news.
Disinformation is real.
Disinformation is necessary.
Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True
Why was this necessary?
What questions were asked re: SA prior to SA events?
Why is this relevant?
Think mirror.
Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you.
What is a map?
Why is a map useful?
What is a legend?
Why is a legend useful?
What is a sequence?
Why is this relevant?
When does a map become a guide?
What is a keystone?
Everything stated is relevant.
Everything.
Future provides past.
Map provides picture.
Picture provides 40,000ft. v.
40,000ft. v. is classified.
Why is a map useful?
Think direction.
Think full picture.
Who controls the narrative?
Why is this relevant?
What is a spell?
Who is asleep?
Dissemination.
Attention on deck.
There is an active war on your mind.
Be [p]repared.
Ope[r]ations underway.
Operators [a]ctive.
Graphic is essential.
Find the ke[y]stone.
Moves and countermoves.
They never thought she would lose.
Snow white.
Godfather III.
Iron Eagle.
Q
.
what the fuck about it, [FAGGOT]?
Trump did not place hand on Bibles during 2025 swearing in
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-did-not-place-hand-bibles-during-2025-swearing-in
Trump appears to not place hand on Bible
https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1579767
Trump did not put his hand on the Bible at inauguration
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-bible-inauguration/
Trump doesn't place hand on Bible during swearing-in
Chief Justice John Roberts administered the oath of office
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-inauguration-hand-bible-swearing-in/story?id=117897715
Trump’s hand wasn’t on the Bible during the oath of office: What does this mean?
https://thehill.com/homenews/nexstar_media_wire/5096082-trumps-hand-wasnt-on-the-bible-during-the-oath-of-office-what-does-this-mean/
Trump Swears Oath Without His Hand on Bible
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/20/us/politics/trump-hand-bible-oath.html
Trump does not swear on Bible during inauguration
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-stirs-curiosity-online-after-not-placing-hand-bible-during-oath-2025-01-20/
Donald Trump Did Not Place Hand on a Bible as He Took Oath of Office
Trump was sworn in as the 47th president of the United States on Monday, Jan. 20, taking the presidential oath without placing his hand on the Bibles Melania held beside him
https://people.com/donald-trump-did-not-place-hand-on-bible-presidential-oath-8777444
Trump didn’t take his oath on a Bible: What that means
https://baptistnews.com/article/trump-didnt-take-his-oath-on-a-bible-what-that-means/
MAGA supporters blame this person for Trump not placing his hand on Bible while being sworn in
https://www.silive.com/politics/2025/01/maga-supporters-blame-this-person-for-trump-not-placing-his-hand-on-bible-while-being-sworn-in.html
Vatican control of World Health Organization population policy
An interview with Milton P. Siegel
"This interview with Professor Milton P. Siegel, who for 24 years was the Assistant Director General of the World Health Organization, was recorded in 1992 by Dr. Stephen D. Mumford, President of the Center for Research on Population and Security.
This is the first time that it has been made available to the public.
Because of his position and the length of his tenure, Professor Siegel is considered among the world's foremost authorities on the development of World Health Organization policy.
In this interview, he reveals the influence of the Vatican in shaping WHO policy, particularly in blocking adoption of the concept that overpopulation is a grave public-health threat – a concept which, in WHO's early years, enjoyed a broad consensus among member countries.
Without this separation of population dynamics from WHO public-health policy, the Vatican would have found it much more difficult to subsequently manipulate governments on such issues as family planning and abortion.
National leaders would have been able to refer to the international consensus, as demonstrated by WHO policy. WHO, they could have insisted, has determined that family planning and abortion – like clean water, good nutrition, and immunizations – are necessary to protect public health.
Professor Siegel decided to speak out on the subject. As he was involved in the WHO at an early stage, his personal experience provides ample evidence that the Vatican influenced WHO policy development from the outset, during the early period of the Interim Commission in 1946.
In its 63-year history, this international health body has had a deplorable record in family planning. Its commitment has been minuscule, and even today family planning accounts for only a tiny fraction of its budget.
Professor Siegel joined the World Health Organization in 1946, when it was still in its formative stages – under the umbrella of the United Nations, created just the year before.
Because of his earlier work in North America and the Middle East, he was asked, in effect, to be one of WHO's "founding fathers". So he came on board on the senior staff of the Interim Commission.
Dr. Brock Chisholm of Canada was the Executive Director of the Commission, which set up the permanent organization with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. Dr. Chisholm was chosen to be WHO's first Director General."
Hi!
My persona is NIGHT SHIFT yet [FAGGOTS] call me Vati
Q drop #4799 was my most recent Q.
The story behind Q drop #4799 is well worth the read and interdastingly revealing.
Enjoy!
NIGHT SHIFT' MOST RECENT Q
Q DROP #4799
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 09/30/2020 23:52:42 ID: 376386 4799
8kun/qresearch: 10864489
Anonymous 09/30/2020 23:43:23 ID:39774c
8kun/qresearch: 10864305
Image Name: 09302020nyt1.png
Filename: 08e41859ca2515db376999299074104a284701075e774fa4c4ab36b1ebe9d5d8.png
Rebuffed by Vatican, Pompeo Assails China and Aligns With Pope’s Critics
Pope Francis declined to see Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is demanding a harder Vatican line on China. The Holy See said meeting just before a U.S. election would be inappropriate.
By Jason Horowitz and Lara Jakes
Sept. 30, 2020, 7:26 p.m. ET
ROME — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently published a sharp letter excoriating the Vatican’s plans to renew an agreement with the Chinese government on Church operations in China. He promoted the article in a tweet, concluding, “The Vatican endangers its moral authority, should it renew the deal.”
An indignant Vatican took the article more as a calculated affront than a diplomatic gesture. The friction broke into the open on Wednesday as Mr. Pompeo arrived in Rome and met with prelates and others who are hostile to Pope Francis, while the Vatican denied him a meeting with the pontiff and rebuffed his efforts to derail the deal with China.
“Pompeo asked to meet” the pope, who turned him down because Francis had “clearly said that he does not receive political figures ahead of the elections,” Cardinal Pietro Parolin, who, as secretary of state, is the Vatican’s second-ranking official, told reporters.
But to some observers on both sides of the tensions between the Roman Catholic Church and the Trump administration, Mr. Pompeo’s visit is as much about the coming presidential election as about China policy. Mr. Pompeo dismissed that suggestion as absurd, but intended or not, his trip signals that President Trump is on the side of those conservative American Catholics who worry about the church’s direction under Francis and think he is soft on China.
Francis and Mr. Trump, who have exchanged sharp words in the past, present starkly different visions on issues ranging from the environment to immigration to the threat of populism. In appealing to the Vatican’s support for religious freedom as a reason to drop its China agreement, Mr. Pompeo seemed to seek common ground, but in a way that upset the pope’s chief allies and delighted his chief critics.
Cardinal Parolin said Mr. Pompeo’s article had caused “surprise” at the Vatican, because this visit to Rome by the secretary and the meetings with high officials at the Holy See had already been in the works and would have been a “more opportune” forum for airing grievances. He added that Mr. Pompeo’s choice to publish in First Things, a conservative Christian magazine that has called Francis a failure as Pope, also mattered.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/world/europe/pompeo-pope-francis-china.html
>>10864305
When does a Church become a playground?
When does a Church become a business?
When does a Church become political?
When does a Church become corrupt?
When does a Church become willfully blind?
When does a Church become controlled?
Q
==OH WAIT! The re up of the "Secret Vatican China Accord" was breaking right when POTUS started yelling "CHINA CHINA CHINA FLU WUHAN FLU CHINA CHINA CHINA!".==
For 2-3 weeks anon tried to get this into notes.
POTUS just screaming "Wuhan China!" the entire time.
No BAKER would note it.
Understand?
and right when anon is whooping the piss out of a fucking blatant Neo Nazi allowed not only to bake but BV, Q drops down and Q's Anon…
Yup! Hard trolling just like NIGHT SHIFT is right fucking now.
Can you believe it?
8 years!!!
The God damn Glory of being NIGHT SHIFT though!
o7