anon remmys the face-palm, smirk.
tyb
hey any PF's out there that can help anon figure out who this is? They definitely do not want to be known.
https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a03977
Three GOP attorneys general issuesubpoena for Anthony Faucifor probe into awards
"Government officials have a certain level of immunity in their official capacities, but if Fauci personally profited off of the ‘guidance’ he issued, that very well could have broken Florida law," Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said.
By Kevin Killough
Published: August 6, 2026 10:52am
Three Republican attorneys general subpoenaed Dr. Anthony Fauci as part of a joint investigation into how he handled the COVID pandemic.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey, and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill issued the subpoena.
The investigation is focused on awards, professional opportunities, financial incentives, grants and COVID-19 guidance that impacted Florida businesses and consumers, according to an announcement from Uthmeier's office.
"Government officials have a certain level of immunity in their official capacities, but if Fauci personally profited off of the ‘guidance’ he issued, that very well could have broken Florida law," Uthmeier said in the statement.
The subpoena is informed by the "diary" that Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., released last month. The documents show that substantial awards were given, including an approximately $900,000 Dan David Foundation prize, a NIAID research grant to the University of Florida Scripps Biomedical Research program, offers of named professorships and book deals, board positions, private foundation partnerships, and other professional and financial opportunities concurrent with his federal role and public recommendations impacting Florida.
The subpoena demands documents related to those awards be produced.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/three-gop-attorneys-general-issue-subpoena-anthony-fauci-probe-awards
Federal judge upholds ruling that 'tower dump' warrants are unconstitutional
A magistrate judge ruled the "tower dump" warrants are general warrants and therefore impermissible, and District Judge Carlton Reeves agreed.
By Kevin Killough
Published: August 6, 2026 11:26am
A federal judge in Mississippi ruled on Wednesday that "tower dump" warrants are unconstitutional.
In a "tower dump" warrant, law enforcement requests a cell phone company turn over time and location data for all mobile devices connected to specific cell towers during a specified period, The Hill reported.
Last year, law enforcement sought approval for several of these warrants as part of an investigation into gang-related activity in the area of Jackson, Mississippi. Authorities argued that the data could help identify the suspects involved, particularly incidents without known suspects.
A magistrate judge ruled the "tower dump" warrants are general warrants and therefore impermissible, and District Judge Carlton Reeves agreed.
While the warrants could help identify potential suspects, Reeves wrote, "law enforcement would also have access to the cellular records of countless individuals, the vast majority of whom were merely passing by a location at the ‘wrong’ time." The ruling repeatedly referenced the Supreme Court's recent decision that "geofence warrants" are unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/federal-judge-upholds-ruling-tower-dump-warrants-are-unconstitutional
The White House / @WhiteHouse 08/06/2026 14:09:50
Truth Social: 117049903742598464
A new release on election integrity shows Arizona’s largest county had a major election data breach just DAYS before the 2020 presidential election. A self-described hacker bypassed security and stole 633,000 voter registration files - but theBiden DOJ declined to charge him.
READ more: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/6amhundreds-thousands-voter-files-were-hacked-arizona-2020-doj-declined
https://truthsocial.com/@WhiteHouse/posts/117049903742598464