I was here earlier briefly. People were talking about Alex Jones and I was being a complete asshole. I was under informed at the time. I hadn’t heard about the deplatforming due to travel today.

Let me be clear. I think Alex Jones and Infowars are nothing but controlled OP for the DS. His only job is to make money and make people that seek truth look insane. All in all I think most of these people are pieces.

But, what happened to infowars and AJ today is much bigger than that fuckwit. This is the new line in the sand the DS is trying to make us accept. The banning of AJ and Infowars is the test run of banning across the board anyone the Cabal deems to peddle conspiracy theories. This is their plan to shut up Q in my opinion. They ban AJ and we except it. They are then free to start banning people, web sites, and people that visit websites they don’t like preemptively.

Tl;dr “I may disagree with what you say, but I’ll fight to the death for your right to say it.” -someone smarter than me.

>>2491192

Um, I just got back, mind a quick fill in on this guy?

>>2491428

We actually should. The real 0hour1 left a long time ago. Whomever tuns the Twitter 0hour account now took it over almost immediately when the real one deleted it. He even claimed at one point that he was friends with real 0hour and that he “lived down the street.” All BS, the account was an obvious disinformation ploy with low followers but quickly got a ton of followers because one the twit celebs gave him a shout out at one point. I wanna say Liz Crokin, but not 100% on that.

He’s also previously went hard at Q claiming Q was a LARP around the same time Thomas Wictor was calling out Q

>>2491523

100% we can NOT allow this. AJ is the canary in the coal mine.

>>2491570

Can’t say, banned or deleted. But I started following the new Ohour around the time SR hit the news. Not the initial murder but when OANN and Crossfire on RT did the story.

>>2491623

Often times when Twitter suspends an anonymous information source with a recognizable name they then replace it with a controlled account.

The anon whom originally owned it has no recourse to recover it because they’re anon.

>>2491677

Honestly, he’s been asking for it for a while. I actually believe that he and Eye the spy I are the same person/group. The MO is always the same.