Trump was supposed to ditch the toupee and go natural gray in his second term as he rounded up all the criminals
Didn't get the memo
We get leftist level memery of fatvance and boufant Trump instead
Oh and Kevin Clinesmith
Good Job Guys
Oh I get it because muslims fuck goats! All of them do, obviously. It's not grouping all people into a category and then ascribing a singular characteristic to that entire category, and then labeling them as such, you know, like a star on the forehead, for instance.
You mean what is Israel going to have the U.S. do?
No only normal people see the world this way
It's amazing how many content creators don't know (or don't care) that thinking people would never click on a thumbnail like that.
How about fix the money first
Oh that would be good for plebs
Not important enough to worry about in the first 12 years
bombs, money, and taxes are fantastic problemsolvers
the only problems left when they are done are the ones that are the last administration's fault, and the next administration's responsibility
Yeah only REAL republicans are respectable.
If I've learned anything from Qresearch, it's the Value of Republicanism.
Make it your life's mission to get Black Voters to be Republicans. That will save us, more Republicaning
Long Live The Republican Party Leadership
Believes government to be the source of solutions, rather than the source of problems = is the source of the problem
One either never had credibility
Or lost it by telling the truth
Or lost it by allowing time for the government to tell the truth, should it deign to find the truth convenient to itself
Your fellow citizens are so smart, a small percentage of them are just now questioning (cautiously, while boosting) whether America should Make Hugs Illegal Again
Headlines that begin with how a whole group of people collectively feel inside when red text happens dramatically to them
24914056
Haven't received a reply that wasn't a non-sequitur in about 2 years
What do kun?
And that is how liberty dies. To advance your personal preferences, you are willing to violate the rights of others. Do you also claim to support the rule of law?
Both would be directly violated by allowing surveillance data to be collected by an unconstitutional agency
Yes, that would be a horrible thing, unambiguously
The solution is not to compromise morally and legally in the name of your favorite political problem because 'oh well' commies are doing it too
Principles are not negotiable
Limited government
You are adopting the tactic and principle of the special interest here
The solution is power returned to the people
Citizens don't want it but governments are so powerful they can do it anyway and citizens are powerful to stop it
You want to then use that overreach to wield government as a solution in your preferred direction
Not American
Diversionary inconsequentialist reframe
Whomever behaves as you project is unlikely to gain from rational discourse
Your participation subtracts
Yes, a narcissist expert employed by government to be the literal spokesperson for public health advice is not the problem, it is his victims, and we should join you to help soften the consequences of his predatory behavior.
And will continue to be. The ancient civilizations reached sustainability through the inertia of a healthy and educated populace aimed in a well understood common peace, the opposite we see is difficult to turn around. Anyone who advocates for a return to adhering to a simple set of rules based on logic and observable reality, that takes into consideration the nature of man, is considered radical and impractical. Much more practical, they say, is to follow the likes of Fauci and his apologists, and to heed the advice of Wall Street in it's infinite wisdom, and to give power of the purse and the reigns of war to those very few who have brought on the decline.
phew, was afraid the government wouldn't have enough money