These things are driving me mad when reading MSM articles bashing Q.

~Journalists often confuse brainstorming/open discussion as things Q is saying. Q posts and then people have an open discussion.

~Not one article uses qanon.pub or qmap.pub as a source where people can only view Q’s post.

Did the journalists read through all of the boards? How did they know which messages were Q’s?

~When searching for information on certain posts in google. Search criteria is extremely filtered and flooded with conspiracy articles.

What was a simple search that would easily find certain Q posts if you had questions now leads you on a wild goose chase to find anything.

~Q does not have a twitter

~None of them talk about the 45,000 seeled indictments.

~None of them talk about the massive amounts of resignations

~They think pizzagate is our bible and that is why we are here.

~Snopes is nowhere to be found on anything Qanon. Scared of the answer?

They have nothing labeled true/false regarding anything from Q.

They do have some things related to the topic but…

When you search Qanon only 4 articles come up. Billboards and Hillary deep web pedo video.

~They discuss the attempt to shoot down trumps plane and other topics.

But don’t provide any proof or investigation that it didn’t happen.

~One person in the news means we are all crazy and insane.

Guy in Truck with rifles demands OIG report at Hoover Dam.

He is linked to Q because of a letter from prison where he signed off with WWG1WWA.

Does that mean that we all told him to go out and do that?

So using logic that would be like saying this…

Killing someone while wearing a Yankees jersey or hat means the Yankees were behind and supported your murder.

~What in the hell is an opinion writer at the Washington Post?

Isn’t writing your opinion a blog?

What happened to investigative journalism?