thanks baker

rewatching Hannity: "There is exculpatory evidence in what we want declassified"(paraphrased)

Nunes didn't specify WHO it exonerates though

>>2492545

rewatching Hannity: "There is exculpatory evidence in what we want declassified"

(paraphrased)

try that again

>>2492568

kek that'd be crazy as fuck

>>2492579

I agree

>>2492576

until AJ says he was wrong about private AND outside comms, its meh

you can tell he didn't know anything about Q

underrated crumb

odd thought:

Fake News collaborating and pushing knowingly false information?

>yes

Fake News ‘KNOWINGLY FALSE’ narrative pushes.

>if the MSM is pushing KNOWINGLY FALSE narratives about Q.. does that mean they KNOW ITS TRUE?????

>>2492730

I know, couldn't tell, but it was either shills or newfags saying earlier "do we know this is Q, it sounds different"

I just ignored

>>2492707

>>2492715

see this: >>2492723

does the MSM KNOW Q is legit??

>>2492727

This is notable, not sure what to call it baker

>>2492773

like anyone is going to believe anything you just said

>>2492812

read this

then lurk

(open in a new tab)

>>2492831

[20] = # of pages in the FISA that need to be declass'd

>>2492857

its supposed to be though

meant to be a thorough introduction

still a rough draft

>>2492844

what that anon said: >>2492879

but read that pic, might help you understand moar

>>2493041

a couple of anons and I have been keeping it out of general:

>>2476158 (off bread)

>>2476158 (off bread)

>>2476158 (off bread)

write your own too, just had the idea of fighting disinfo with info

(meant to be basics too)

KEK

I'm out for the night, but check this out, got the idea randomly and made a gif of it

>>2493113

shit, forgot to crop

this

see you in the morning anons