Anonymous ID: 7f0fc3 Aug. 11, 2026, 8:36 p.m. No.24926012   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6029

Basically, what it boils down to is 8 split from 4, right? In a way, kind of similar to how the US split from Britain, and last time I checked, British rules and law do not have authority over the US, so why does halfchan think their rules have authority over other websites?

Anonymous ID: 7f0fc3 Aug. 11, 2026, 9:15 p.m. No.24926101   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6109

>>24926059

LOL! Doubling down, huh? Alright, I'll use two parallels for my argument.

 

Look at Reddit. Look how many aggregators started up splitting away from the bullshit at Reddit. They have a similar UI and appearance and function, but Reddit's doesn't have authority over those aggregator websites.

 

Look at X. Look at how many micro-blogging platforms popped up copying Twitter's interface. Does X's rules have authority over those other micro-blogging websites?

 

So what makes halfchan think its rules have authority over every chan? What makes people blindly follow those rules like a quasi-religious dogma that they try forcing onto others?

Anonymous ID: 7f0fc3 Aug. 11, 2026, 10:11 p.m. No.24926200   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6220 >>6225 >>6250

>>24926143

Good tune, though I do prefer 5FDP's cover. It just makes no sense to me for a website that was founded on migrating away from another website to follow the rules of the website it migrated away from. Being in conformative lockstep with what's essentially dogma from another website is completely antithetical to freedom of thought in my opinion, or at least from my perspective. I mean, people are free to follow those rules if they want, I choose not to follow that dogma.

 

I mean, humiliating a woman if she essentially "shows herself" or making an issue out of the pronouns a person uses that "the hive" doesn't approve of parallels with what?