Not everyone, the urbanites do the phone zombie
Weekend coning, there shall be mud, beer, and fun
Sterns, Richard Gaylore
Born 1944 in Los Angeles, CA
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Nominated by William J. Clinton on October 27, 1993, to a seat vacated by John Joseph McNaught. Confirmed by the Senate on November 20, 1993, and commission issued on November 24, 1993.
Education:
Stanford University, B.A., 1968
University of Oxford, Balliol College, M.Litt., political philosophy, 1971
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1976I smell Conflict of Interest
Professional Career:
Special assistant, U.S. Sen. George McGovern of Massachusetts, 1972-1973
Speech writer, Lt. Gov. Thomas P. O'Neill III, Massachusetts, 1975-1976
Norfolk County [Massachusetts] District Attorney's Office, 1976-1982
Assistant U.S. attorney, District of Massachusetts, 1982-1990
Associate justice, Massachusetts Superior Court, 1990-1993
https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/stearns-richard-gaylore
>>24931680 (me)
Judicial Scouting Report for U.S. District Court Judge Richard G. Stearns
David E. Frank February 27, 2013
Stearns earned a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford University in England. While he was there, he roomed with future President Bill Clinton. He once told a reporter that Clinton was “the most natural politician I’d ever seen. Within an hour of our meeting, I told people [he] would be president someday.”
“Not every problem has a legal solution,” Stearns is quoted as saying. “Rigid insistence on the rule of law as a value that transcends all others, even at the risk of collective suicide is, as Justice Jackson famously warned, simply too high a price to pay.”
Stearns is a former Democratic Party operative, serving in a number of political posts, including as director of delegate operations for the presidential campaign of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (1979-1980); speech writer for the office of Lt. Gov. Thomas P. O’Neill III (1975-1976); and special assistant to U.S. Sen. George McGovern (1972-1973).
In 1993, Stearns was considered the top candidate for appointment to director of the FBI, but after facing criticism for his liberal leanings and opposition from then-Attorney General Janet Reno, he withdrew from the nominee pool.
Stearns was appointed to preside over a controversial suit challenging Boston public schools’ student assignment policy in 2000 when U.S. District Court Judge Nancy Gertner was ordered to step aside for commenting on the case to the Boston Herald.
SOME OF HIS NOTABLE RULINGS
Stearns held in the December 2012 Genzyme Corp. v. Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc., et al. decision that press releases are not protected scientific speech. The case involved a biotech company that sued its competitor under the Lanham Act for distributing a press release that allegedly made false claims about a drug manufactured and sold by both companies. Stearns found that secondary dissemination of the scientific research referenced in the release did not rise above ordinary marketing speech.
The judge ruled in March 2011 that the Department of Health and Human Services cannot impose religiously based restrictions on reproductive health services for victims of human trafficking.
In 2007, Stearns accepted a guilty plea from former House Speaker Thomas M. Finneran on a single count of obstruction of justice. Stearns sentenced Finneran to 18 months of unsupervised probation and ordered him to pay a $25,000 fine.
Stearns issued a ruling in October 2012 that insurance carriers could reimburse attorneys’ fees owed under a duty to defend at a “blended” fee rate, rather than the actual higher rate billed by the lawyers. “Under the circumstances, the court finds that the insurers’ reimbursement hourly rates were reasonable and fairly compensated the attorneys for the value of the legal services rendered,” he wrote.
He recently denied a motion to dismiss brought by Ropes & Gray in a multi-million-dollar malpractice suit filed by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. The Boston law firm argued that the laboratory failed to allege in its complaint that a Ropes partner’s conduct caused it any harm. “However … the Amended Complaint repeatedly pleads that Vincent’s alleged misconduct caused CSHL significant harm. … Thus, the court is unpersuaded by defendants’ argument that CSHL’s negligence claim should be dismissed.”
More:
https://masslawyersweekly.com/2013/02/27/judicial-scouting-report-for-u-s-district-court-judge-richard-g-stearns/
You gots names of billionaire and yacht?
Which one is which?
You are behind, from the land that brought you sperm extractors, Chyna is making bots
Feminist FURIOUS That Men Are Replacing Her With AI Robot Girlfriends
1 month ago Run Time 15:42 (footage from Oprah show)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRcBeV1p2ro
Modern Women Are Losing Men To AI Robot Girlfriends
1 year ago Run Time 13:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXGmtkbKeuc
For the record, I'm interested in replacing No-Fault Divorce with Sharia Law Divorce
I came in, brought goodies
Chinese robot with electrovag, sperm extracting and vibrating excellence that never nags
Western Women can't compete
Same chick stood behind bullet proof glass and said New Yorkers need to "pull up" on the South?
around and around and around and around
Same playbook:
Attack Jim W if and when possible, when that fails
Attack BO, when that fails
Attack BVs, when that fails
Attack Bakers, when that fails
Attack anons in general, when that fails
Attack specific anon, when that fails
Back to top
Looks like a crane
Will you have better material for the Weekend or will it be just more of the same impotent shite?
>Police Warn Bystanders Risk ASSAULT Charges for Stopping Crime
In other news, Tucson bystanders have increased support for the Defund the Police movement.
I'm guessing the Pima County Charter includes provision for Militia but not organized police force?
>>24932363 (me)
>I'm guessing the Pima County Charter includes provision for Militia but not organized police force?
I guessed wrong. Pima County does not and has not had a Charter similar to New England. The place was set up by legislature of the old Arizona Territory and had carried on under mostly State Law since. The Sheriff's Posse is still an option, but the rules about it in modern times greatly restrict its use and members. Article 16 of the Arizona Constitution does provide for militia of all able bodied male citizens between the ages of 18-45
Note: I had to find the stuff using the Leo AI from Brave as metacrawler kept returning search results for charter schools