tyb
>moar dots
>spammy retard
did you verify the accuracy of the AI used to generate these graphics?
I member recently when anons were asking for the sauce to the "newspaper style" meme of daily notables, but they were just the same AI generated graphic
Wondering how this will playout
Also good thing you give up the primetime dayshift just to backseat for the selected dayshift primetime replacement
You see? And when you hold the generator parameters, who else can take that meme, and say "fix this error", on a generated meme that cannot be sauced
You say "looks good gerbs, notable bun dew it"
I say "did you fact check the accuracy?"
And then errors start being fixed
Linear progression
seems we both iz and having an interaction while doing so
AI anything can't be blindly trusted just cuz who dun it, and it ties directly into the previous gerb notables which were just AI generations that nobody could "look up" after
You just have to take the AI generated notable at face value
Which is disingenuous to how notables have operated
Something was nommed without sauce
I question the accuracy
Then it starts getting fixed
Not my job to dictate to Baker not to actually notable the thing that was incorrectly nom'd
This is the extent of "my job" on the matter
Probable incorrect AI generated meme "facts" are not notable, and when it's a direct push of an individual that is an endorsement
It's good you know the words though
I care not, if pointing out inaccuracies being nom'd makes me the bad guy for not going along with the gerbs coordination then so be it
Causing nothing but second guessing?
As they then went and corrected mistakes?
What is this "nothing" you are trying to interject?