Anonymous ID: 729d74 Aug. 14, 2026, 4:59 p.m. No.24935795   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6173

>>24935743

TYB

 

Pepe Deluxe 🐸

@deluxe_pepe

·

6h

We need to do this in America

https://x.com/deluxe_pepe/status/2088317951434719504

 

Fuck off you sluts, go to your own church, this is Poland. Jesus Christ is God.

In Polish a CURVA is a whore.

He's really giving it to them.

PIERDOLA or PIERDOLICH is fuck around.

He's telling them, if you whores fuck around here, you'll find out.

Anonymous ID: 729d74 Aug. 14, 2026, 5:58 p.m. No.24935936   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5940 >>5946

Looks like Candace spilled the beans that Joe Kent

started the Israeli plot against Charlie Kirk rumor.

Firstly, NSA supposedly picked up on a dozen Israeli phones on campus at Utah that day.

 

Anon opines that if MOSSAD were doing the job,

they're not stupid enough to let their phones ping

in that geolocation.

 

Now why would Joe Kent do that?

Was he fed false information to see if he would leak it?

And if so, then Kent fell for it.

At any rate, we saw Robinson on the roof shooting,

in near real time. Only minutes after it happened.

Anon opines had we not solved that here so quickly,

that it would have taken longer to track him down,

meaning he would have got away with the weapon.

The fact law enforcement closed in on him so quickly,

is what forced his hand to confess. He knew he would be tracked down,

due to having to leave the weapon behind.

Anonymous ID: 729d74 Aug. 14, 2026, 6:53 p.m. No.24936121   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6131

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

Nothing to see here.

Just another bird in a tree.

 

https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/2088429894195642576

 

Johnny Bebad

@JohhnyBeBad1

·

 

Why are they vaccinating the Penguins in Australia?

I opine they're going to kill birds in nature to demonstrate H5N1 is a threat, and then attack the poultry industry.

Do you have any insight on it?

 

https://x.com/JohhnyBeBad1/status/2088440974339178725

 

Robert W Malone, MD

@RWMaloneMD

·

5m

Because the Australian government has gone bat-shat-crazy.

 

https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/2088441804915945552

Anonymous ID: 729d74 Aug. 14, 2026, 7:33 p.m. No.24936259   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Rand Paul

@RandPaul

·

10h

I have been asking to see the gold at Fort Knox since February of 2025. This week I finally went deep underground and looked for myself. Yes, the gold is there, roughly 147 million ounces.

 

The real lesson is not the gold itself. It is what happened to the dollar after 1971, when we severed it from gold. Over 85% of its value is gone. Gold does not expand when Congress spends. Paper money does.

 

https://x.com/RandPaul/status/2088298854785409378

Anonymous ID: 729d74 Aug. 14, 2026, 8:06 p.m. No.24936372   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24936316

Boss, if the court rules against the nation, then it is

obviously corrupt.

There can be no other way to process it.

How can the courts be cleaned up if they collude against the nation along with congress and senate?

What constitutional previsions exist to bring to heel a corrupt US court system?

 

It would appear they think they're untouchable.

And with good reason, because basically, they are.

 

Practical realityIf one assumes Congress and the Senate are themselves colluding with a “corrupt” judiciary, the Constitution’s primary remedies run through those same elected bodies (impeachment, jurisdiction changes, new appointments after elections) or through the amendment process. There is no separate extraconstitutional “national” override that bypasses them. The system relies on separation of powers, staggered elections, and the difficulty of altering entrenched institutions. Proposals for statutory term limits (e.g., 18-year active service followed by senior status), ethics codes, or jurisdiction limits are debated; some argue they can be done by statute without amendment, while others contend life tenure under good behavior requires an amendment for core changes. Courts themselves would likely review such statutes.

 

brennancenter.org

 

In short, the Constitution prioritizes an independent judiciary checked mainly by impeachment for serious misconduct, congressional structural/jurisdictional authority, political appointments over time, and the amendment process. It does not treat adverse rulings as self-evident proof of corruption, nor does it provide a simple majoritarian mechanism to “bring the courts to heel” when they interpret the law differently from any particular political coalition.

 

MITOW