The issue needs to be reframed. It's not preventing 'hate speech' or 'encouraging violence' when AJ/Infowars is banned, it's about the danger of the major platforms conspiring to remove a voice they are threatened by.

This is a major event…crossing the Rubicon. Today Jones, tomorrow any critic countering the agreed upon narrative. "Danger Mr. Robinson!"

Unfortunately the lunatic-left suffers from some form of organic brain impairment. Sounds like a joke but it's true. Yesterday a prestigious journal, with a focus on science, published as much. My bad for not marking it, a symptom of chronic sleep deprivation. I'm lucky to have a few hours of lucidity at all.

Watching these lunatics do their vagina dance and call blacks, such as Candice Owens/Sheriff Clarke "white supremacists etc., has always perplexed me. Some of the people closest to me exhibit this shit. They call it the 'resistance' and believe their taking an ideological/philosophical/political stance against Trump but, after endlessly researching/studying/observing I finally have, what I believe to be, part of the true explanation. Yesterday they attacked a prominent black pastor who flew to DC to meet the administration and discuss prison reform. Anyone with half a brain, especially in the minority communities, should be able to set aside their personal bullshit feelings for the greater good of the community. The headlines, if true, for Chicago just last weekend read like dispatches from a war-zone. Muh we lock up more people than any industrialized country, blah, blah, blah…but if this administration tries to improve it (where every other just talked the talk and did nothing), then too bad, resist!

This isn't about Jones! This is all a reaction to losing a grip on the narrative. Desperation!

Despite whatever anyone here believes about Infowars (muh Corsi, muh zack, muh controlled opposition), I watched the campaign and election. He brought many people towards Trump and helped expose the Clinton cabal…he paid people to blast "Bill Clinton is a rapist!" "CNN is fake news!"

Wake the fuck up! Wake up!

It is a blatant first step to banning us!

I've sat through nine months of moo joo horseshit. Do you REALLY believe (they), can't label this hate speech! What the fuck is wrong down here…you know where I stand, don't blame me. And fuck off if this is too wordy, meme the cute dancer from the roaring twenties. For my sanity I'm going to tell myself every shill to this post is either brock bullshit, brennan tomfoolery or some other agent provocateur.

WAKE UP! This is the scene from the Wizard of Oz where everyone falls asleep…this concerted attempt at outright banning an undesirable voice is just as dangerous, I'll say even more, than an errant missile from a sub. Defensive systems are in place against the latter…wide-scale zombie nation still untested outside of the movies.

>>2494516

Great idea anon. Anything constructive like this gets my enthusiastic support (for what it's worth).

Have to confess though, I'm out of my league with ideas…stuck sounding the alarm. If you can rally people to help, wonderful!

On a side-note, I joined twatter late in the game. Had subtle Q symbology, never expressly commented on GA, but it was a very pro-Trump, pro-America account. How can anyone not be supportive of America doing well? So I thought.

Was quickly shadow banned. Was tested by a respected IT company in Europe. Now it's an open secret, though Breitbart covered it early. I thought 'gab' might take hold, but I never had the energy to start there. Point is this: it's very tricky to have to fight using their comped tools. Think that may be a long-ball approach but I'm worried we need something quicker. Just my take, but again, great constructive idea. I'm all for it. Good luck.

>>2494531

Cheers anon. We're on the same page and I like the dancing gal too..,I'll check before I post this, just saw an extended .gif with her yesterday.

As to the diversity. I guess my take, not fully thought out mind you, is if people would snap out of the division and hate, then who knows. I think a lot of our problems result because everyone still digs in with their tribalism. We are what we are, it's a reality regardless of our feelings, we need to start making the best of it…it's the only way (again, I think). To me it feels like we're heading over the cliff and it's late in the game. The paradigm really has to change in dramatic ways, which is over my pay grade. As an example it would simply be nice for us to work together to help, in my case, the excessive heat. Fear it's making people edgy at this point. I'm totally miserable. Trouble is, even that topic has been comped. Those who were out front, at least getting mainstream exposure, were revealed to be charlatans. When Al Gore wasn't busy assaulting women ging him a massage at 5 star hotels, he was busy working with the big banks to become a multi-billionaire overnight, as soon as the carbon-trading legislation was implemented. Like Leo, he was also busy flying city to city on a private jet and living in a mansion…large footprints. Then the prestigious research center, about to release the largest study ever, was hacked and what was revealed was they were busy burying studies that didn't fit the global warming narrative. The point isn't to case a slide, it's just to illustrate we need an entirely new approach to urgent problems. Thus far, and not to sound like a socialist (I'm no Bernie/Cortez groupie), the system only works for a small portion of humanity. Who gives a fuck about gmo food when you own massive private plots, world wide, where you have your own real food grown? Who gives a fuck about the increase in taxes for a cleaner environment when you just got $50 million from Netflix and $65 million for your 'memoirs.' Hope Q is correct. Think Q+ is working on macro-issues. Now to the dancing lady…cute as all get out. Godspeed.