Can someone give me some feedback on this?

First (pic related), Q has previously confirmed AJ is a dooshcanoe. (Not to mention all of Corsi's fuckery.)

Now, reconsider Qs crumb yesterday:

The BILL that opened the door for TWITTER, FB, GOOG, etc. to CENSOR & CONTROL.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5181/text📁

Think Russian bots.

Think Foreign propaganda.

The more you know.

Q

This all comes on the heels of infowars ban yesterday. Understanding that AJ is controlled opposition, is

Q confirming that Alex Jones is BILL Hicks? That BILL and his fear peddling, funded by foreign entities, played a role in opening the door to censorship?

>>2494542

Well that seems a bit uncalled for. No actual thoughts on it tho? Just ad hominems? And you call me the shill.

>>2494564

I don't give a fuck about the (you) faggot. I agree the post is editted. But Q did respond to a post calling AJ a traitor. If infowars being kicked off social media is a DS move to boost his legitimacy, then Qs post was a warning shot.

By calling AJ out as being Bill Hicks. Seems like a pretty benign observation tbh. You seem unstable. Is that you Jerome?