lawfag here
this is a real stretch
to constitute a crime it would have to be shown 1. that a foreign GOVT was aiding a candidate OR
-
that a foreigner was spending money to influence an election
that is a crime of the THAT person not the candidate or campaign -
to implicate another person (ie trump jr) if would have to be shown that they knowingly
-
accepted money from a foerign GOVT "actor or agent" - not an ordinary citizen
OR
-
accepted foreign campaign donations
as we all know NONE of these apply so the stretch is that someone "accepted foreign campaign donations" IN KIND in the form of paid intel they passed on to someone -
THIN - VERY THIN - SO THIN IN FACT ITS A SEE THROUGH BULLSHIT THEORY MSM NARRATIVE