This infographic thing is getting out of hand.
Material generated by GROK is not notable, it is sauceless.
Much of it is repetitive, like Vati's material, and therefore SPAM.
I have discussed this with you directly, baker.
They are not notable.
On the road to being spam.
Baker,
much of the spam here is also "validated."
Notables are for fresh news picked up by HUMAN sources (not GROK), preferably multiple sources and/or ones that have proven trustworthy.
Sometimes we also pick up fake news in order to show what the media is doing, making it clear that it's fake.
We do not rely upon AI as a source.
Nor do we rely on random opines or info given by anonymous "insiders."
Specious material is given wide berth by most anons but is ok as long as it's not spammed or doesn't get pushed into notables.
>a.i is the tool of the fake msm..
agree, although often useful for digging when it leads to info with sauce
Just lousy as sauce itself
KEK
>https://www.qnotables.ai/blog/epstein-files-release-timeline
>ran through GPT to verify and summarize
>summarization means interpretation
Who's doing the interpreting?
Who verifies GPT?
i could also make a graphic in photoshop, anyone could.
AI can just do it quicker.
Images are powerful – why used for propaganda.
Without substantive arguments to support the info stubs, that's all it is.
>This wall of links comes of as non-organic
Agree.
This is the problem of querying the internet for lists of related items using extremely broad criteria.
Presume most of these lists if not all are AI, since most people won't go to the trouble of compiling them.
Not useful even for diggers.
TBH, I wrote against AI many years ago
Not against it as a way to find leads but as a way to generate a synthesis
because that involves interpretation
Would never fully trust a machine that way
Anyone remember Eliza?