your religion of atheism doesn't even bother to learn history.
did I get it wrong?
irrational reactionary raving doesn't make for comprehensible content.
maybe what you think are 'gods' are just fallen angels who say that they are. I know that they exist but the term 'believe in' is a bit ambiguous. I don't believe that they are gods but that they are what might be called 'demons' or even just 'alternative creatures'.
by knee jerk reaction is a 'claim'? the purpose of my post wasn't a 'claim' but to refutate the statement about 'religions erasing history'. Much of our history was preserved by religions. that why I said that atheists don't bother to learn history, assuming that the poster were Atheist. But it doesn't get through to you my point? I think my point is clear, though you demand explanation mostly just to waste my time. Ever hear of a guy named Cassiodorus? maybe you could learn something by looking him up. PS: the monks of Europe used to copy old texts in order to preserve History.
which topic? In fact I'm being verbous and giving you an explanation as to my original purpose, but that doesn't seem to matter to you. try to comprehend this: a throw away post gets responded to by another throw away post and now you demand a dissertation thinking you've somehow trapped me into falsehood. You're being a bit ridiculous. Try to comprehend and stop trying to bully
if you're an atheist or not a monotheist, that's all you. There is only ONE God in three people.
if you don't know that I'm sad for you so I told you.
you're a conflict shill which gets you filtered. Good bye.
I didn't respond to you. I wasn't sure what you were on about.
'dark'? like in 'dark coffee' or 'dark skinned?'
or like 'Dark Night of the Soul'?
if you mean 'dark' as an synonym for 'evil' or 'falsehood' I'm not the one to ask to teach you that. I didn't look up the proverb you quoted but I guess I could.
That line needs the other lines around it for context.
"
1 The parables of Solomon, son of David, king of Israel,
2 in order to know wisdom and discipline,
3 to understand words of prudence, and to accept the instruction of doctrine, justice and judgment, and equity,
4 so as to give discernment to little ones, knowledge and understanding to adolescents.
5 By listening, the wise shall become wiser and the intelligent shall possess governments.
6 He shall turn his soul to a parable and to its interpretation, to the words of the wise and their enigmas.
7 The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. The foolish despise wisdom as well as doctrine.
"
from https://biblehub.com/cpdv/proverbs/1.htm
you seem to be a scripted nonsense shill or AI bot.
the term enigma is closer to the real meaning of the original text.
The King James translation is useful because it's veyr poetic but it doesn't always give a meaning that jives with the original text. See:
and thank you, 73cdd1, for providing this context.
Bible Scholars often use multiple translations. Very serious Bible Scholars learn the original languages and read those texts of the scriptures.
here is a point:
if someone is smart enough to know about the book of Proverbs, and actually references the part that suggests studying the enigmas of holy scholars (proverbs) then why would that person ask some random person here to 'teach me' about these and not just read the Book of Proverbs? If you have the insight to get the first chapter, 6th line, maybe you'd also have the insight to keep reading. And if you don't understand read multiple translations of the same?
hence I say 'scripted bot'
you veer off into unsubstantiated accusations against those people who ? ? ? who against exactly?
Wisdom, anon, is often expressed in enigmas, IE: proverbs. Instead of trashing everyone else here why don't you just read through the Book of Proverbs and learn something?