'rest of us'? who is that? why do you suppose that you speak for some 'us'.
your meaningless statement is just provokative.
what does that mean 'moving to the future?'
sounds like you think you're some kind of influencer here.
that means you don't really belong.
you're kind of a creep and a scold.
describing yourself in the 'future' all alone with your High Fructose Corn Syrup drink and your indignation?
there is no 'us' at QReasearch in the way that you meant it. You're not a king here, nor does anyone care about your opinions on AI or Google.
sounds like the two of you are what you say I am.
you don't speak for me, or the board. you're just a couple of what you claim I am.
have a nice day.
are they silver or gold American Eagles?
what do you do, bury them in a box?
after you die someone's going to find them in two thousand years and go 'we're rich!'
your false narrative that somehow the cameras will save the election is a talking point created to gather support for an egregious invasion of privacy.
it's far fetched that they will be used for anything other than spies targetting people and rouge police stocking their ex girl or boy friends.
none of it will do anything for election integrity. It won't help and no one will use it for that. It's for the spies and the assassins.
'built the camera by hand'
what a load of crap.
it's a mash up of other items and technology that was perfected a generation ago. It was probably a group of well known foreign nationals with funding from European banksters. They got technology that other people made and married it together, probably paying no one any patent royalties but claiming patented tech on their conglomeration.
Cameras are not built by 'hand' they are made in a semiconductor fabrication furnance.
PS: the principles of the company probably don't know anything about technology other than to hire south asians to do the work and then fire them all after it's completedl.
you must have been given a large amount of stock in that multi-national spy-camera company.
the voting might be real but the counting is definately filled with fraud.
PS: that little false aphorism 'vote or you get what you are given' is an immoral justification that tyrants who steal elections use. In fact most people understand that most of government is self-serving and immoral and just do as little as they need to do in order to not be hassled and/or arrested for understanding how fraudulent it is to think that it's the 'will of the people'.
even if you steal an election you are still supposed to do the right thing by the people. your false aphorism is an excuse that tryants use to self-enrich and steal.
PS: Society has a method to deal with those with your point of view. People survive.
Elections are cooked. The voting if perhaps valid but the counting is fraudulent in most Blue states.
people put up with government and live their lives knowing that the free-masons who run the town halls do as they will and self-serve.
live in your fantasy that voting is really important. In Blue states it doesn't matter anymore. Republicans never win anymore.