>>24974803
Yes, also anon the timeline is older than most Biblical scholars believe but the world much younger than the physical creation would imply prior to being phased in from a precreation stage. So, all the genealogies or many of them listed in the Bible are subject to having been abridged to include all the key names in the lineages skipping over many less prominent members of the lines. Noticed that from Matthew chapter 1, where Matthew lists, Abrahm to Jacob who was Israel, only one name between them, Issac, Abrahamโs son who both lived earlier than commonly, thought by about 300 years, to account for almost 600 years whose son, which was not a grandson, but obviously a great, great one x several others, from Issac, who was biblically claimed to be a full hundred years younger than his father Abraham, as worth telling, until we get to Joseph, who led them into Egypt about 3900 years ago or 1700 BC, to bring the Israelite clans for a 300 year stay, in Egypt as key name, Issac for having been born to Abraham at his age 100, was an anomaly made possible by God, Issac could not have begat Jacob himself who lived until 1700 B.C, even if Abraham was born in 2000 BC in Ur, but believe 2300 in Ur. So found this answer above discussing how those generation skips worked and why they existed. Likewise, Genesis in the table of nations must do the same to account for the vast period of time from the beginning, that I have been studying, as the world is 21,000 years old and the flood was 9,300 years ago