Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 7:20 p.m. No.24980450   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0643 >>0837 >>0885

Russian Airforce Lt Col Killed in St Petersburg Car Bomb Attack

August 27, 2026 | sundance |

Deep breath. Yesterday, CTH noted to pay close attention to the Finland-Russia border region and the areas in/around St Petersburg. There has been a visible coordination between Finland and Ukraine in the attacks against Russia. I would not be surprised to hear this terrorist crossed that border region.

 

A Lt Col in the Russian Airforce was killed immediately when a car bomb exploded that also severely injured his wife. As you are reading this there are also reports of thousands of Ukraine civilians fleeing Kiev ahead of Russia’s predicted retaliation. The serviceman was killed in an area heavily occupied by military personnel and their families.

 

This is the fourth car bombin the past few months and the seventh Ukraine car/parcel bombing in the last few years. Zelenskyy is in Moldova today organizing new attacks against Russia.

 

• RUSSIA – A senior Russian officer has been killed by a car bomb in St Petersburg, Russian media reported.

 

Footage posted on Telegram showed emergency workers and police flooding a street littered with the debris of an exploded vehicle and cordoning it off from the public.

 

An explosion sounded at around 10am near a Magnit supermarket in the suburban neighbourhood of Shushary, killing the lieutenant colonel and badly injuring his wife, according to Fontanka, a St Petersburg news publication, which cited eyewitnesses.

 

The outlet claimed that both had lost their legs in the blast, which took place as they began driving away from their home. (read more)

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/08/27/russian-airforce-lt-col-killed-in-st-petersburg-car-bomb-attack/#more-286414

 

This is not going end well for Z and his partners in crime.

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 7:37 p.m. No.24980470   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0472 >>0477 >>0494

President Trump and USGS Officially Change Name of Lake Ontario to Lake America

 

August 27, 2026 | sundance |

President Trump holds a press availability in the oval office for a signing ceremony changing the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America. Additionally,President Trump answered questionsabout the U.S relationship with the Canadian government.

 

Listen to the presser and you fully understand President Trump’s position on U.S-Canadian trade and the trilateral NAFTA/USMCA agreement. Trump noted he is now finishing the North American trade and economic policy that he began in his first term. There is not a single moment of hesitation in his responses. WATCH:

 

President Trump also fielded questions about the Ukraine war and the status of relationship with Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin. President Trump succinctly said,“he’s not going to attack NATO.”(KEK!)

 

President Trump Participates in Signing Time, Aug. 27, 2026

 

The White House

 

12:16

 

https://www.youtu.be/Kr7Ep94Mq1A

 

TO: Office of the Secretary, Department of the Interior

FROM: Director, U.S. Geological Survey

 

RE: Lake America rename

 

Sir,

 

As of 4:30 pm today the U.S. Geological Survey has officially designated the former Lake Ontario to be renamed as Lake America in all official USGS electronic documents.

 

The change will begin occurring in printed documents over the next several days.

 

This change has also been made official in the Geographic Names Information System.

 

Should you have any further questions please contact me for clarification.

 

Thank you

 

Ned

 

Dr. Ned Mamula

Director, U.S. Geological Survey

United States Department of the Interior

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/08/27/president-trump-and-usgs-officially-change-name-of-lake-ontario-to-lake-america/#more-286407

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 8:01 p.m. No.24980507   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0509 >>0597 >>0760 >>0962 >>0973 >>0985

Judge blocks Trump’s Postal Service regulation on mail-in ballots

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order that prevents the Postal Service from inserting itself into the election process while litigation continues.1/2

 

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order that prevents the Postal Service from inserting itself into the election process while litigation continues.

 

A federal judge Thursday blocked a Postal Service regulation that would exert control over mail-in ballots ahead of the midterm elections in the latest setback on the issue for President Donald Trump.

 

The recently finalized measure would implement a key provision of Trump’s executive order on mail-in ballots that would add a new level of bureaucracy to the elections process, which is typically administered by states.

 

The executive order directed the U.S. Postal Service to, among other things, track mail-in ballots and potentially reject those submitted by people not on a federal list of eligible voters.

 

The decision by Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in one case brought by the League of Women Voters and other groups and another brought by a coalition of states means part of the executive order remains blocked for at least 14 days, with time running out to implement it ahead of the November election.

 

“This rule is a clear attempt by the federal government to interfere in elections it has no power to control,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “Today, a federal court halted it before this administration could wreak havoc on our elections.”

 

Talwani wrote that the regulation is most likely unlawful because the president cannot insert the federal government into elections without the express authorization of Congress.

 

“The court finds plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits of their claims,” she said.

 

The Trump administration could seek to quickly overturn her decision by rushing to the Supreme Court.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/judge-blocks-trumps-postal-service-regulation-mail-ballots-rcna594692

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 8:01 p.m. No.24980509   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24980507

2/2

Trump often criticizes mail-in ballots, claiming without evidence that there is rampant fraud even though they are widely used by Republicans and Democrats all across the country.

 

Talwani noted in her ruling that the administration had not offered “any evidence regarding fraudulent absentee or mail-in voting.”

 

The government’s interest in “correcting an unsubstantiated problem through likely unconstitutional means is dwarfed by the overwhelming risk of pervasive disenfranchisement,” she added.

 

Directly addressing the short time frame ahead of the election, Talwani said states “have neither time nor funds” to meet the necessary requirements, including updating election management systems and training staff members.

 

Based on the evidence before her, states’ compliance with what the Trump administration is asking of them before the 2026 midterms would be “practically impossible,” Talwani wrote.

 

In a separate decision Wednesday, Talwani lifted an earlier injunction she had imposed that blocked vital elements of Trump’s executive order in the case.

 

It is a different injunction from the one the Supreme Court lifted Monday in a similar case brought by California and 22 other states. Talwani is overseeing both cases.

 

The Supreme Court found that Talwani had acted too hastily in ruling on the executive order but did not weigh in on whether the underlying proposal or the Postal Service regulation is lawful.

 

While the Postal Service regulation is now blocked, a provision of the executive order requiring the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of eligible voters and send them to states remains in effect.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/judge-blocks-trumps-postal-service-regulation-mail-ballots-rcna594692

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 8:47 p.m. No.24980576   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0578 >>0597 >>0650 >>0651 >>0760 >>0973 >>0985

Independent Journalist Nick Shirley Leaves New York Times Reporter SPEECHLESS After She Tries to Defend California’s “Stop Nick Shirley Act” — Then She Allegedly Cuts the Interview Short. 1/3

by Jim Hᴏft Aug. 27, 2026 7:00 pm

Independent journalist Nick Shirley turned the tables on a New York Times reporter who repeatedly pushed the Democrat defense of California’s so-called “Stop Nick Shirley Act.”

Independent journalist Nick Shirley, the 24-year-old YouTuber whose viral reporting on empty Somali-run “learing centers” in Minnesota and hospice schemes in California helped blow open a national fraud scandal, was interviewed by NYT reporter Laurel Rosenhall outside the State Capitol after a rally against Assembly Bill 2624.

 

Rosenhall is The Times’ Sacramento-based California politics correspondent. She showed up with a notepad. Shirley showed up with a camera, a “Califraudia Republic” hoodie, and a simple question the paper of record could not answer: why is California writing a law that protects the people spending public money instead of the people exposing how that money disappears?

 

Shirley posted the clip Thursday with a caption that said it all:

 

“Here is the New York Times realizing they are advocating for a law that would effect journalism and fraud from being exposed.”

 

Rosenhall starts in defense mode. According to her, lawmakers maintain that the bill was already being developed before Shirley traveled to California.

 

Shirley immediately shot back: “Not true.”

 

“Because I announced on January 31 that I was coming to California,” Shirley explained. “I had already filmed the videos. The word had already gotten out that I filmed inside these immigration support service providers, and then they created the bill before I published the video.”

 

Official legislative records show Democrat Assemblywoman Mia Bonta introduced AB 2624 on February 20, approximately three weeks after Shirley says he publicly announced his California investigation. Bonta is married to California Attorney General Rob Bonta.

 

Rosenhall continued pressing the Democrat talking point, telling Shirley that immigration-service providers claim they had experienced problems “for quite a long time” and were supposedly unaware of his work when they decided the legislation was necessary.

 

“It’s a lie, quite frankly,” Shirley responded.

 

Shirley argued that California already has laws against doxxing and threatening people and warned that AB 2624 creates a special protected class for virtually anyone associated with an immigration-service organization.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/independent-journalist-nick-shirley-leaves-new-york-times/

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 8:47 p.m. No.24980578   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0579

>>24980576

2/3

 

“There’s no need for this bill,” Shirley said. “They’re making a protected class by specifically saying immigration support service providers.”

 

The enacted legislation defines “immigration support services” broadly to include legal representation, advocacy, case management, humanitarian relief, referrals, translation, counseling, and healthcare.

 

Even more troubling, the law’s definition of a protected provider includes a person who “provides, assists in providing, or receives” those services.

 

The law also defines protected “personal information” to include names, physical descriptions, photographs, video footage, telephone numbers, employment histories, license plate numbers, and financial information.

 

Rosenhall then claimed that individuals could not simply receive the law’s protections automatically and suggested they would need law-enforcement approval.

 

But that is not the full story.

 

Under the enacted text, a restraining order is only one possible form of documentation. An applicant may alternatively submit a certified statement from the immigration-service organization, or from the employee or volunteer claiming to have experienced threats or harassment, along with a sworn statement of fear. Knowingly submitting false information is classified as a misdemeanor.

 

Shirley warned that the system could be exploited by someone attempting to conceal fraud.

 

“Imagine a fraudster who knows he’s committing fraud,” Shirley said. “He’s like, ‘Oh, well, now under this bill, if I’m committing fraud, I’m just going to go enroll in this program.’”

 

The New York Times reporter then pointed to language stating that posting information becomes unlawful when it is done with the specific intent to incite violence or issue a threat.

 

“If you’re just posting it for information to inform the public, that wouldn’t be a violation, would it?” Rosenhall asked.

 

Shirley responded by raising the nightmare scenario facing independent journalists: Who ultimately gets to decide what the journalist intended after an unrelated third party responds to a report?

 

The harassment standard in the bill, he noted, includes “unwelcome visitation” and “unreasonable fear.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/independent-journalist-nick-shirley-leaves-new-york-times/

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 8:48 p.m. No.24980579   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24980578

3/3

 

“If I go expose a fraudster, are they going to be fearful? Well, of course.”

 

Rosenhall reached for the last talking point: the ban only applies if someone posts information “to incite violence or make a threat.” Informing the public, she suggested, would be fine.

 

Shirley asked the question the New York Times never asks about Democratlegislation.

 

“Who’s to say that? … If I expose it and then I expose it to somebody else and then a third party comes in and incites violence or harassment, what does that mean? That means that they could literally hire somebody to go commit the crime and say that third party was because of Nick Shirley, then Nick Shirley is responsible for that crime, and then we’re gonna give Nick Shirley a $4,000 fine.”

 

He put it on her.

 

“So you as a journalist, if you go expose a Learing Center — do you know what a Learing Center is?”

 

She admitted she had watched his videos. He finished the thought.

 

“If you go expose a Learing Center where there’s no kids at the daycare, they receive $1.9 million, and it just opens up a whole entire fraud ring, and then I expose it, a bunch of other people come in and say someone throws a — I don’t know, say somebody paintballs the building, right? They cause fear for that building, and then you’re responsible for the actions of a third party. But that fraud was real. It completely breaks the trust and the amendment of the freedom of the press by putting other crimes upon another person for reporting the truth.”

 

Rosenhall goes quiet and has to allegedly stop the interview, according to Shirley.

 

Independent reporter Jonathan Choe, standing a few feet away, later identified her by name and said he was “shocked she was this clueless.”

 

Libs of TikTok summed up what millions of viewers saw: Shirley “leaves NY Times reporter SPEECHLESS after she attempts to defend the Stop Nick Shirley Act.” Then the interview ends.

 

The paper that lectures America about “democracy dying in darkness” could not finish a sidewalk conversation with the kid they spent months smearing as an “influencer.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/independent-journalist-nick-shirley-leaves-new-york-times/

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 9:22 p.m. No.24980612   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0635 >>0760 >>0973 >>0985

Fed Governor Lisa Cook responds to Trump administration’s letter stating that it is “considering” her removal

amy-howe thumbnail

By Amy Howe Aug 27, 2026

 

A lawyer for Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook told the White House on Wednesday that allegations Cook committed mortgage fraud before joining the Fed are “unfounded and untrue.” As a result, attorney Abbe Lowell wrote, any effort to remove Cook from her job based on those allegations would be “corrosive of the independence that Congress sought to preserve” for the Federal Reserve Bank.

 

Lowell’s letter came approximately a year after William Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, sent two criminal referrals regarding Cook to the Department of Justice, and just under two months after the Supreme Court, by a vote of 5-4, rebuffed President Donald Trump’s initial attempt – citing the mortgage fraud allegations – to fire Cook. The opinion by Chief Justice John Robertsheld that “Cook was entitled to notice and some opportunity to respond” before she could be fired.

 

On Aug. 5, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino notified Cook that Trump was “considering” whether to remove her from the Fed, and he gave her 21 days to respond to the mortgage fraud allegations.

 

In Cook’s response, Lowell explained that when Cook in 2021 signed a mortgage agreement to buy a condominium in Atlanta that designated the property as her “primary” residencealthough she had signed another agreement listing her home in Michigan as her primary residence, it “was an entirely inadvertent oversight,” without any “intentional misconduct and zero intent to defraud or mislead.” Cook had gone to the lender’s website, Lowell emphasized, to get information about a mortgage for a vacation home – which, he wrote, was “a clear indication of the loan type she was looking to acquire.” Indeed, Lowell noted, the mortgage lender “knew that she had lived in Michigan for more than 15 years and worked full-time as a tenured professor at Michigan State University.” “All the information Governor Cook provided concerning her Michigan residence and employment,” Lowell stated, “indicated that she did not intend to make her Atlanta condominium her principal residence.”

 

The letter also pushed back against suggestions that a rental listing for theAtlanta condo provided “further proof of wrongdoing” on Cook’s part, by demonstrating that the condo was not her primary residence. Cook’s mortgage agreement did not prohibit her from renting the property, Lowell stressed. And in any event, Lowell added, “though Governor Cook briefly listed the property for rent, she ultimately decided not to rent it.”

 

Lowell pointed to reporting that suggests that several senior officials in the Trump administration – including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Attorney General Todd Blanche – had also “entered into ‘primary’ residence mortgages for multiple homes,” noting that those men had not been fired.

 

Indeed, Lowell noted, in 1993 Trump himself “reportedly acquired ‘primary’ residence mortgages for two different Florida homes just seven weeks apart.” Although Trump “signed a form attesting” that he would live in those properties for at least a year, he actually lived in New York during that time and “reportedly listed both Florida properties for rent.”

 

Finally, Lowell submitted an expert opinion from Kathleen Engel, a law professor at Suffolk University Law School who specializes in mortgage finance and regulations.She indicated that, based on the materials that she had reviewed, “no banking or mortgage professional can reliably conclude that” Cook received more favorable terms for either her Atlanta or Michigan mortgages because they were listed as primary residences, that either mortgage “lender relied on an allegedly false occupancy representation” in deciding to lend to Cook, or “that Dr. Cook acted with an intent to deceive.”

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/08/fed-governor-lisa-cook-responds-to-trump-administrations-letter-stating-that-it-is-considering-h/

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 9:28 p.m. No.24980618   🗄️.is 🔗kun

RedWave Press

@RedWavePress

 

CNN’s Dana Bash: “You’re a lifelong Democrat. If you were a Michigan voter, how would you vote in the Senate race?”

 

Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ): Laughs “There’s no way I’m ever coming out for El-Sayed, right now… This is a guy who has made it VERY CLEAR his views towards..

https://t.co/U8EgaoGnzx

 

https://twitterwebviewer.com/?tweet=2092315961244180536

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 9:32 p.m. No.24980620   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0622

Karmelo Anthony Prosecutor BREAKS SILENCE On Trial, Misinformation & Death Penalty

 

The Karmelo Anthony trial is far from over. He is now appealing the decision after he was found guilty of murdering Austin Metcalf. Breanna Morello sits down with Greg Willis, the district attorney overseeing the prosecution, to debunk some of the misconceptions about the trial and explain why the death penalty was never an option.

 

https://youtu.be/Th1sWJUxRII

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 9:42 p.m. No.24980628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0630

Trump admin set to target George Soros nonprofit, Southern Poverty Law Center and CAIR in major tax crackdown: sources

By Published Aug. 27, 2026, 3:18 p.m. ET

 

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the IRS could revoke the tax-free status of left-wing nonprofits such as George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, three sources familiar with the matter have told The Post.

It is part of a Trump-backed crackdown on “bogus” charities, and Treasury officials are drawing up a sweeping audit of outfits deemed to be using and abusing Uncle Sam’s tax code, the three people briefed on the Treasury Department’s internal policy deliberations said.

Bessent’s inner circle is drafting a blueprint that could ultimately strip non-compliant organizations of their 501(c)(3) status, according to two of the people familiar with the plans. The reviews could result in massive back payments and civil penalties, the same sources said.

The initiative leans in part on a 2025 executive order signed by President Donald Trump targeting nonprofits operating with a “substantial illegal purpose,” paving the way for the IRS to issue fines or even strip the tax-exempt status of charities allegedly tied to political violence, protests or radical ideologies.

Officials have also scrutinized a number of anti-corporate and labor-aligned advocacy groups that could end up on the blacklist, including the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, the anti-Amazon Athena Coalition, left-leaning watchdog MediaJustice, and the Strategic Organizing Center alongside its parent union, the SEIU, according to the three insiders briefed on the matter.

One of the sources warned that Treasury Department officials were “like a dog with a bone” and reckoned that many of the groups and their donors could be “on borrowed time.”

“There’s a lot of internal pressure to get it done, but some people are still moving too slowly at the IRS,” the source said. “That is expected to change very soon.”

The aggressive crackdown is already facing fierce legal blowback. Left-leaning legal powerhouse Protect Democracy sued Treasury and the IRS earlier this year, accusing the administration of illegally weaponizing the tax code against its political opponents.

The suit claims Bessent and the White House are bypassing strict federal tax laws to conduct a partisan witch hunt that violates the First Amendment rights of progressive charities.

While there is intense internal pressure from some administration officials to get “a good chunk of the crackdown” over the line before the midterms, others have argued for delaying formal enforcement until later in the term to avoid triggering massive, protracted legal battles, the three sources said.

There is a fear that adding high-profile domestic political targets like the SPLC and Soros’ network will trigger a wave of lawsuits, potentially stalling any momentum against foreign terror-linked groups like CAIR, these people told The Post.

The Treasury Department declined multiple requests to comment, but Bessent confirmed last October on the “Charlie Kirk Show” that work on compiling the hit list had begun.

Formally stripping a group of its 501(c)(3) status is a notoriously sluggish process that can take years, involving protracted IRS audits, internal administrative appeals, and inevitable battles in federal tax court.

To help with the review of nonprofits, Bessent enlisted Tony Saffier, a former special operations veteran and AI executive recently tapped to spearhead the interagency task force.

Penalties under consideration range from corrective fines to the ultimate regulatory sanction: full revocation of tax-exempt status, which would force the nonprofits to pay the standard 21% federal corporate tax rate.

A Post analysis of the latest IRS filings for all three organizations shows they would have owed about $165 million in federal income tax for 2024 if taxed at that 21% rate.

 

Almost all of it comes from a single source: the Soros network accounts for $163.6 million of the total. The SPLC would owe roughly $354,000, and 17 CAIR chapters would owe about $860,000 between them. That combined total amounts to a mere rounding error for the US government’s coffers…..

 

https://nypost.com/2026/08/27/business/trump-admin-set-to-target-george-soros-nonprofit-in-tax-crackdown/

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 10 p.m. No.24980636   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0641

Lavrov reveals what brought CIA chief and Vatican envoy to Moscow

 

The simultaneous high-level contacts come as Moscow says it has lost faith in Western promises

Published 28 Aug, 2026 04:26

 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has addressed this week’s unusually intense diplomatic traffic in Moscow, shedding light on talks with the Vatican’s top diplomat while remaining deliberately vague about a visit by CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

 

Archbishop Paul Richard Gallagher, the Vatican’s Secretary for Relations with States and International Organizations, and Ratcliffe were both in the Russian capital this week, prompting RBK to ask Lavrov what lay behind the visits.

 

“In both cases, those who came to us wanted to come and talk,” Lavrov said in an interview published on Friday.

 

Gestures of goodwill and broken promises

Lavrov said his discussions with Gallagher focused heavily on the Ukraine conflict, with the Vatican envoy reiterating a desire to see hostilities brought to an end as soon as possible and offering continued assistance on humanitarian issues, including prisoner and body exchanges.

 

The foreign minister used the meeting to recount a long series of diplomatic agreements broken, abandoned or derailed by Kiev and its Western sponsors – from the 2014 Maidan coup-era agreement to the Minsk accords used to buy Kiev time to rearm, and the 2022 Istanbul talks derailed by London.

 

“I pointed out that there had been no shortage of goodwill on our part… I think he understood everything. I would say he had no counterarguments, apart from the general slogan that ‘it needs to stop as soon as possible,’” Lavrov said.

 

Lavrov also told Gallagher that the Western push for a ceasefire along the current line of contact would merely freeze the fighting without producing a lasting settlement. Plans to deploy British- and French-led “stabilization forces” would effectively preserve the “neo-Nazi regime” in Kiev that suppresses the Russian language and the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, he said.

 

Quiet intelligence channels

Lavrov was much more guarded about Ratcliffe’s visit.

 

“I wasn’t there,” he said, noting that intelligence agencies routinely communicate through established channels and that “there is nothing unusual” about such contacts taking place quietly. Diplomats, he added, also often work “in silence.”

 

“Of course, we do not disclose details that are too sensitive or are still being worked out, where it is important not to jeopardize possible compromises and consensus,” Lavrov said.

 

The top diplomat also denied allegations that Moscow had issued any kind of ultimatum to the administration of President Donald Trump following media reports that US intelligence has been used to facilitate long-range Ukrainian strikes against Russia.

 

’The end has already come’

Lavrov argued that Moscow remains willing to talk to Western governments but no longer assumes that public assurances or negotiated understandings will be honored.

 

“Deception is the basis of Western diplomacy. And it remains so,” he said, citing what Moscow regards as broken NATO assurances on expansion and successive derailed agreements over Ukraine.

 

Asked why Russia had continued to give its counterparts the benefit of the doubt, Lavrov said Russians tended to believe in people “until the very end.”

 

“But the end has already come,” he added, arguing that relations with the West would never return to what they were before February 2022.

 

What happened to Anchorage?

Lavrov presented last year’s Trump-Putin summit in Anchorage as the latest example of that frustration. He said Russian President Vladimir Putin went through a US peace proposal point by point with Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, who confirmed that it represented the American leader’s position. Putin then accepted the proposal despite some remaining “nuances,” according to Lavrov.

 

If this is not consent and not an agreement, then I don’t know what an agreement is,” he said.

 

Washington disputes that characterization, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying in June that there had been “a proposal in Alaska, but there was no agreement.”

 

According to Lavrov, the Anchorage understandings were subsequently undermined over the following months by EU and British leaders. French President Emmanuel Macron eventually declared at the G7 summit in Evian in June that Anchorage had been “buried.”

 

Trump himself, however, has not explicitly declared the Anchorage framework dead. At the original August 2025 summit, he described the talks positively while cautioning that “there’s no deal until there’s a deal.”

 

Lavrov said Moscow remains ready to hear new US proposals, but in the meantime Russia will “continue working on the ground.”

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/644746-lavrov-goodwill-promises-cia-vatican/

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 10:03 p.m. No.24980641   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24980636

NYTs makes up another explanation

 

==C.I.A. Chief Delivered Bleak Assessment of Russia’s War in Secretive Moscow Visit

John Ratcliffe’s meeting this week with a Russian intelligence chief was aimed at pushing the Kremlin to pursue a peace deal with Ukraine.==

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/644746-lavrov-goodwill-promises-cia-vatican/

Anonymous ID: 8ab59c Aug. 27, 2026, 10:12 p.m. No.24980654   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trump puts schools ON NOTICE with MAJOR push

Defending Education founder Nicole Neily discusses the Trump administration's bold move to return education power to the states and protect parental rights.

 

3:48

 

https://youtu.be/XEouFqSOQfw