Anonymous ID: 72f64a Sept. 4, 2026, 6 p.m. No.25007791   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>Trump will not admit his failures.

Forgot to add, you neglect to acknowledge his winning and unprecedented amount of accomplishments and focus on the one or two instances that you think you can spin against him.

Anonymous ID: 72f64a Sept. 4, 2026, 6:12 p.m. No.25007815   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7820 >>7826 >>7840

>>25007796

Interesting. If chess could be solved by an AI though, then wouldn't it just be solving playing itself like a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters until it types the solution? Until one finally fits and then that'd be just like a seed or something so it could be replicated. What's the approach? Brute forcing all possible combinations? I don't know. I'm kind of siding with the chess guys on this for now. How would it account for the nuance of decision and calculating risk that grandmasters have?

Anonymous ID: 72f64a Sept. 4, 2026, 6:20 p.m. No.25007829   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7833

>>25007820

Yeah, but you look at just Stockfish for example, it's claimed to be 3600 ELO. I don't know any grandmasters that've beaten it. But that's just something that can beat a human at chess, not "solve" chess. And checkers is only weakly-solved anyway, you know, based on a standard starting position.

Anonymous ID: 72f64a Sept. 4, 2026, 6:52 p.m. No.25007878   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25007840

Yeah, I've never heard of anyone beating Stockfish unhandicapped. A quick search with an AI and it can't reference a single instance of a grandmaster beating it either.