>>2501143

>uses Christian language and imagery.

unless you're a libtard, that fine

>has never mentioned Israel in any negative context.

wrong, Israel is for last

>was pro- regime change in Iran.

wrong, peace through strength (ex: NK)

>equates methods of ((( MSM ))) with that of Goebbels.

fuck them both

>psyop

InfoOp

go back to leftypol faggot (muh hashtags)

>>2501153

gtfo famewhore

based anon from last bread

sums up my view too

>>2501190

hi PDT anon

Q's comms are in EDT/EST

>>2501196

are you just shilling or are you serious?

Q links NYT and WaPo too

they monitor many sauces

>>2501216

go advertise on twatter

>>2501218

>>2501242

anon, I posted the second one

its news, MOS was been called out twice by Q

they fake jihadi suicide boomings, thats notable

its actually not muh jews anon

>>2501268

stfu newfag/shill

>>2501301

<uses QANON

<didn't see the BO whitelisted Q

<says bakers have something to do with it

wow, try a lot harder dumbass

>>2501374

I'm moar suspect you now

its being widely reported

try harder (((MOS)))

(((MOS))) CONF

33ad93

>>2501488

holy fuck newfag

thats Q replying to posts here

lurk another week please

fucking newfags for fucks sake you fucking fucks

>>2501568

its 10% anon

if you count them (I have before, not doing it now) its always less than 20 AT MOST, usually only 10

but they're an glowing bunch

>>2501592

see: >>2501584

theres ~ 170 UIDs

if there are 17 shills, its 10%

I doubt theres moar than 20 shills right now

>>2501647

I didn't even know how to respond to that, so I just didn't

so many things wrong with that statement

<oh the WaPo and NYT said so, so NOW its true

>>2501617

>>2501664

>>2501723 List of recently unsealed indictments

NOTABLE

>>2501735

which missile attack was MOS?

you mean AF1?

don't think it was, it was the cabal in general, moar likely C_A imo

>>2501746

>Think sealed indictments count.

a glimpse of whats sealed

>>2501758

there are sealed indictment that aren't federal

and check the articles, they were all 'unsealed'

>>2501804

I'm aware

>>2501821

so they are federal and part of the list???

(not a lawfag)

if they don't make it into this bread's notables, report next bread

BO/BV

checked new bread because I was using the catalog, f6c338 is the same muh AJ copypasta fucking faggot shill

banhammer appropriate imo

d29a36

well thats new

leftypol or straight libtards are hopping on the shill bandwagon