https://duckduckgo.com/?q=grinder+controversy+at+republican+midterm+convention+in+dallas&t=hg&ia=web
What the hell is going on in Dallas?
Very interesting 9/11 document from 2022
The Golden Cover-Up
Written by John Carroll
https://www.quitefrankly.tv/quite-frankly-originals/2022/9/10/the-golden-cover-up
https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/Collateral-Damage-911-black_eagle_fund_trust.pdf?__cf_chl_tk=DaUVd.870vCx9RgvCHsLqnLuzuxhT4d9uxC3Sva0NxA-1789086421-1.0.1.1-9XSqXuvLfdwZ248Y.tTRCLkP.pworpw7dgGqx_av_A4
>cant believe after nearly 10 years we are still trying to link the q posts to stuff
Well whites only makeup 22% of Texas schools, so a lot has ben lost.
Texas is a joke, everything is bigger, so the fucking of Americans is bigger in Texas than any other place.
Steers and Queers, Indians, Mexicans, and a minority of white.
Any anon have a good description of Trumps plan to alter our currency to Stable coin?
Involving Bonds and Japan and Iran?
With pipe lines on the rise.
Luger's should be in high demand for military, intelligence, and terrorists.
Time to unionize all the Luger's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luge
We really do not know what happened.
However it worked out really well for Trump, America, and Israel.
Kirk was about to go hard publicly against Israel's desire for war with Iran.
Look at how good war has been for the stock market and wealth generation in America.
Israel, our greatest ally, is gaining control of the middle east and will soon be were all our bases are located.
The build out will enrich MIC and Technocracy, and we can ride that wave to great returns.
So Kirk at least died for something, a lot more than all the vaccine deaths.
America and Israel against the world is very profitable as war generates revenue.
We lessen the world population and have to mine more minerals, so money is to be made.
Let's get us some generational wealth.
No such thing as a good cop.
All oaths under the current laws of America and your state, are against the constitution.
https://constitution.org/1-Law/ussc/005-137a.htm
Here the language of the Constitution is addressed especially to the courts. It prescribes, directly for them, a rule of evidence not to be departed from. If the legislature should change that rule, and declare one witness, or a confession out of court, sufficient for conviction, must the constitutional principle yield to the legislative act?
From these, and many other selections which might be made, it is apparent that the framers of the Constitution contemplated that instrument as a rule for the government of courts, as well as of the legislature.
Why otherwise does it direct the judges to take an oath to support it? This oath certainly applies in an especial manner to their conduct in their official character. How immoral to impose it on them, if they were to be used as the instruments, and the knowing instruments, for violating what they swear to support?
The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words: "I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as —, according to the best of my abilities and understanding agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States."
Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the Constitution of the United States, if that Constitution forms no rule for his government? If it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?
If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or take this oath, becomes equally a crime.
It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall he made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
The rule must be
Discharged.
>I thought Trump said
Trump says a lot of things.
CBDC refers to Central Bank, Stable coin is designed to be private but take ownership/replacement of the dollar by demanding US treasury bonds to be purchased as buy in.
Eventually all US bonds are owned by a private congromalate, and the dollar is no more.
From what I understand, why I was asking for more.
You guys do not love Israel enough.
Get on your knees and pray for guidance.
God wants Israel first, and America second.
We cannot shed the label big Satan, until we make Israel the bigger Satan.
We are working on it, do not offend God and get in the way, please.