>>2502613 lb
>Failure to seize phone, text, emails records of conspirators is a major snaffo.
Failure to seize phone, text, emails records of conspirators is an indication that they are criminals too.
This isn't being 'inept'.
This is being comped.
Kislyak?
Was Ohr/Steele protecting Kislyak?
>Steele replied, “If you end up out though, I really need another (bureau?) contact point/number who is briefed. We can’t allow our guy to be forced to go back home. It would be disastrous.”
Maybe Kislyak was working with them.
Maybe THAT is what Nellie Ohr's ham radio was for…
https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/26/politics/russian-ambassador-kislyak-leaving/index.html
>snaffo
>Learn.
>WW2 military lingo
Yeah, I got that, thanks.
But that implies ineptness, not enemy action.
>the whole FBI wasn't protecting "our guy", it was just Ohr.
I read that is the backchannel of info to FBI/Strzok was protecting 'our guy'.
If Ohr went away, Steele needed another backup channel to protect the guy.
Another option - Browder.
Browder was in UK at the time, with Steele, his US Visa revoked.
Was Steele the backchannel for Browder to provide talking points to the FBI?
We'll continue to promote a healthy conversation by ensuring tweets aren't artificially amplified.
Translation: We pretend all his followers are just bots and we shadowban the fuck out of him.