>Is this a way to legitimize our research here by going after foreign country's dis info first? I am not a law / grant / gov funding fag but this may be an avenue to not only get funds via the HR, but legitimize ourselves using their own intent against them.
Unfortunately, names would necessarily be involved, and then we wouldn't be anon.
>Voter fraud in GA
REMEMBER: all election equipment and the process is now under DHS as it is legally considered "national security infrastructure" ergo, messing with/ subverting it/suborning voter or electoral fraud is a national security issue and puts it in a totally different legal category than basic criminal law!
Disappointed that more anons aren't seeing this and rejoicing.