Anonymous ID: bdc229 Aug. 7, 2018, 5:25 p.m. No.2502784   🗄️.is 🔗kun

RICK WILSON HAD AUDIO ISSUES ON CNN

 

I WONDER WHY HE IS HAVING TO COME OUT TO DEFEND HIMSELF

 

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

 

anyone hungry for some tendies?

Anonymous ID: bdc229 Aug. 7, 2018, 5:26 p.m. No.2502801   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2918 >>2943

>>2502772

yes anon

his 'therapist'

 

the therapists 'help' them with mind breaking drugs and crazy re-programming

 

if you can find the therapists names

and line them up

I think you we will love you forever

even though we love you now

Anonymous ID: bdc229 Aug. 7, 2018, 5:55 p.m. No.2503204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3305

Anons, have we discussed this?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Against_Nuclear_Iran

 

I think this is what Q was meaning here.

 

> In July 2013, Greek shipping magnate Victor Restis brought a defamation lawsuit against UANI for claiming that his companies were "front men for the illicit activities of the Iranian regime." In September of the following year, the United States Government (which was not party to the case) filed a motion asserting its right to intervene in the proceedings and requesting that Restis's complaint be dismissed because "continued litigation would risk disclosure" of sensitive matters pertaining to national security.[26] On March 23, 2015 the court granted the government's motion for dismissal.[27] Judge Edgardo Ramos cited four previous cases in which a US court had dismissed a lawsuit on the basis of state secrets when the case did not directly involve the government,[28] but this was the first time in history when the case involved neither the Government itself nor a defense contractor in its employ.[27]

 

Judge was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgardo_Ramos

 

The case involved this guy: https://gcaptain.com/greek-shipowner-victor-restis

 

However, https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/europe/greek-shipowner-victor-restis-cleared-of-embezzlement-and-money-laundering-charges.html

 

> Furthermore, the charge of embezzlement could not be established since the loans had been fully paid, and in particular, a second loan had been paid before it even became due. The Court concluded that therefore there had been an intention all along to repay the loan, and the material ability to do so and that the charges against Restis were wrong.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/19/us/billionaire-named-in-suit-against-anti-iran-group.html