Puh-lease. In my line of work I have seen more than a few penises in my lifetime, young and old, American and foreign-born. The non-circumcised were groady and yea sometimes their female partners had to be treated for infection. Tough to say who gave what to whom. The circumcised penises were cleanest and easier to treat for such things as genital warts, etc. I will say, tho, there was been a trend in millennial penises wherein some were given what I would call partial circumcisions; that is to say some of the foreskin was left in tact but the narrower dangly piece covering the head like the tied end of a ballon had been removed. Meh, whatever. To each his own dick.
FORGOT TO ADD (LB).
Well good. (((They))) dominate the medical field, anyway. I'm sure they can figure out how to perform the procedure at home if they want to. And of course a baby's penis would be subject to contracting a herpes infection if someone happened to put their mouth on it. Not muh argument. I just don't think ya'll who are fixated on some bizarre ritual should make the leap to medical circumcisions are bad. To me medical circumcision is no different than deciding to have wisdom teeth removed. Or get a tattoo. Those hurt, too. Meh. Life is pain.
Interdasting. Yea, have seen that, too. Didn't know what that was called.
>he doesn't clean his cock
>lmfao
Never said I had one, faggot, and never said I didn't. So kys.