>>25037027

>>25037048

wasn't empty, Shack

Stop lying.

"Nobody Died"

You're a joke

Not even an American.

Dude who started that and argued it for realz is an arrogant prick

Dude censors anyone who argues with him

Asshole cult

His site is "members only"

since he can't uphold his side of the argument

Right No one was in the bld

Really?

Dudes from Italy via Sweden

GLOWS so BAD

>>25037059

Try to ask him a question on his cult board. See what happens.

he locks out people who ask questions

Seems legit /s/

Bully for the Truth.

Brother a race car driver sponsored by bin Ladin family

cruel mocking bastard

In league with the killers.

>>25037059

yeah sure, but people here don't know or use cis"

lele

they usually are, paid.

>>25037027

Donald's dick is bigger.

>>25037108

They recycle the same stale images.

No one can dispute though that Trump had him arrested and banned him from all his properties around 2007

Trump also informed on him for the FBI

And all the mentions in the Epstein files were of Epstein plotting against Trump and talking shit about him

Bill was his best buddy, not Trump

Epstein hated Trump

Propaganda rots prople's critical reasoning skills.

Not to mention the hater's can't read. They just watch angry hater videos

oh Right. Gates was Epstein fren too. So was Bannon, and likely 'Alex"

and Fauci

Occams razor, anybody

>>25037140

Epstein visited the Barry white house many times

Epstein was banned from Trump properties

It's all the haters have, so pity them

>>25037123

The guy who is behind the propagation of that research

pseudonym "Simon Shack"

real name Lyden something.

"September Clues" got him "in the door" "off the bat" with thinking people, then like typical "handout" intelligence agent he moved into

"the building was empty"

"deep state would never actuall kill" [their own "office people"

Nobody jumped out the windows.

What else.

massively attacked anyone who disagreed.

his group put out good material like the pdf attached then claimed all the deaths were fakery.

really.

>>25037171

then like typical "handout" intelligence agent he moved into

"the building was empty"

word was "hangout" sorry.

name is Simon Hytten

I remembered wrong.

How did the paid arsonist from 2020 get his phone data open source.

Anybody remember that?

>>25037188

chkt

What does "choose carefully" mean

The buildings were very sturdy

The idea the were weak was promoted immediately by the all the "johnny on the spot" massive flux of shill

hytten denied the jumpers

"Oh no, they would never do that"

and massively attacked other researhers. Banning , Mocking.

"flimsy" ? in imagination only

Were they created with the intention to bring them down.

YES.

Did they use conventional methods?

NO

>>25037354

doubt

>>25037354

here's hytten's brother

sponsored by bin laden family

>>25037171

>>25037298

Not everything is fake.

NOt everything is authentic

That's where you have to use your skill to look at each case and all the context.

Also who's shouting you down the most when you say this or that.

Why would the establishment deny jumpers

because the fire was supposed to be hot enough to bring down the buildings

also likely it was the DEW weaponry which caused them to jump rather than wait for supposed rescue.

You have to remember before the Towers disintegrated nobody with a brain thought they were going to do that.

In some Propaganda clip they have a supposed bystander saying "they are going to come down"

But some smart people couldn't believe it happened. ten seconds to dust, so ran toward the Tower to confirm

It was not an obvious result.

>>25037452

that's testimony about Epstein

court room

Sworn

>>25037454

exactly. they pull out these Bullshit "breaking news" tidbits which do nothing,

but couldn't see the elephant in the room twenty years ago

Really? /s/

Main point is this:

They claim they were shadowing these terrorists,

Yet did't stop them.

They were actually handling them.

D'uh

The first attack i '93 FBI was caught on a tape recording which was brought out in the trail, paying the guy.

That news is well documented but got no legs in the news media

"Our FBI would never do that"

Next stop OK bombing.

Everybody just assumes they are on our side. Yet no oversight.

They lie to Congress, refuse subpoenas and do whatever the f. they want

All because of

"National Security"

sure it is. /s/

They hide documents, won't turn 'em over,

refuse oversight.

>>25037500

^

check out the wide shot on the vid here

There's no incoming aircraft in the wide shot.

he first attack in '93 FBI was caught on a tape recording which was brought out in the trial, paying the guy.

The terrorist didn't trust his handler and recording him and brought the recording to his trial.

Shack did good work, actually

Hangouts always do

that's how they lure you before the double-cross.

>>25037469

>>25037469

Propaganda shot.

I guess you weren't there.

how much do they pay you?

or maybe you were there; Taking the Propaganda shots with FEMA?