Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 4:24 p.m. No.25038015   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25038004

They had a minute or two segment on it that just happened so I don't know if there'd even be a clip of it yet. I think it was on Global Edmonton. They kept saying many this and many that disagree with it, then they brought on some women athletes to condemn the ad saying it sets women's sports back. I guess Canada allowing men pretending to be women into women's sports doesn't or something.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 5:03 p.m. No.25038126   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8132 >>8152

>>25038118

So you want to condemn her because of the fictional character she portrayed. Not everything is a conspiracy. You do know how the Marxists are trying to replace the Western standard of beauty with their lowest common mediocrity, right?

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 5:12 p.m. No.25038149   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8151 >>8153

>>25038143

I'm not projecting anything. You're the one trying to make an issue out of that ad. I'm not interested in your clownslop complaining about a pretty woman in sports ad. For fuck's sake, buddy, lighten up. You're acting like a vampire cornered by a ray of sunlight.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 5:26 p.m. No.25038178   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8183

>>25038173

I don't care about your fuckin' problem with it. And if that's the whole point of your slide, then I have nothing to say to you. Big fuckin' deal, get over it, a pretty woman in a sports ad, and you've gone from trying to make an issue out of the fictional character she portrayed, to whining about "predatory AI market predictions" to trying to make an issue out of me not thinking about it the same as you. Like, I don't want to see your posts anymore for the rest of the bread.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 5:52 p.m. No.25038236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is the third time I've seen Canadian news run the same news segment about the "outrage" this ad is causing.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 5:54 p.m. No.25038240   🗄️.is 🔗kun

LOL! "It sweeps aside the talent of female athletes." The ad isn't about those athletes, it's not even about any specific sport. The fuck is wrong with them?

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 5:59 p.m. No.25038250   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8257

It's probably based in the Marxist standard of beauty they've cultivated in youth, where ads are just generic women either 5 or 6 out of 10's and regular women can look at those ads and relate to them or feel prettier than them, but with with Ms. Sweeney they can't feel prettier than her and that alienates them and triggers their indoctrination reflex to Western beauty.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:20 p.m. No.25038274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8275 >>8283 >>8285 >>8290 >>8291

>>25038257

Why are you so concerned about that? Is that your way to cope? "She won't be as pretty when she's old!" Who cares? Everyone ages, and some men can still see the beauty in a woman that they had in their youth, and some even take precautions to minimize the effects of age, most do actually.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m. No.25038276   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>some even take precautions

some women even take precautions

Just having that following a comma could make it sound like men do.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:22 p.m. No.25038280   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I'm trying to hard and you're trying to make a hypothetical if she'll able to hold her looks as ages? Who's really the one trying hard here. For fuck's sake.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:24 p.m. No.25038286   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I'd say the trying hard is trying to minimize what's going on now with something you don't know how it'll turn out decades down the road, over something essentially trivial to what's going on right now.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:42 p.m. No.25038313   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25038308

>>25038310

Then don't try to make an argument based upon an unknown in the future to try and minimize what is going on now. It's no different than what the fake news is doing. I can sling shit and get it back and whether it. It's not my fault you had a flawed argument.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:46 p.m. No.25038318   🗄️.is 🔗kun

He always did have thin skin. Maybe he should use his Scooby-Doo villain avatar. Oooh, I wonder who it could be under the mask. KEK!

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:52 p.m. No.25038329   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Nice to know Syndey Sweeney triggers him though and his only defence is asking people if she'll be able to keep her beauty in the future.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:55 p.m. No.25038339   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Just don't reply to me with some dumb shit flawed argument based upon personal bias and an unknown hypothetical. It's not my fault you didn't like how I responded. KEK!

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 6:58 p.m. No.25038344   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Yeah, that's all he can do. So, he lies, he doomfags, he despairfags, he insults and passive-aggressively condemns if you don't think of it like he does. Smells like a hive fag raging at the individuality in the anonymity.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 7:07 p.m. No.25038362   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25038353

If there truly was no God, what you would you be trying to convince people of that doesn't exist? Or would it be a conformative utopia if nobody believed in God?

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 7:08 p.m. No.25038364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8377

Scooby-Doo villains are also the person they least expect and was playing both sides. I'm sure that choice of avatar for years is just a coincidence too.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 7:29 p.m. No.25038400   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8453

>>25038371

There's a language disconnect. What means something for regular people means something completely different to Marxists, and their coded language confuses regular people to the point they just go along to get along until it's too late. I wonder if that had something to do with Q getting people into thinking in terms of double-meanings and shit.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 7:45 p.m. No.25038450   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Today's APOD kind of looks like that 3D hat program from back in the 80's you could type in for Basic out of magazines and books.

Anonymous ID: 2a152d Sept. 14, 2026, 7:52 p.m. No.25038471   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8474 >>8485 >>8503

>>25038453

Yeah, it's like to them social justice, diversity, and activism takes precedence over the "patriarchal construct of white law" or some shit. To the point some become zealotous about it, like it's not just law but religion. Almost like it's being used to prime a path for Islam to conquer or something. Everything is upside down and inverted, beautiful women in a sports ad is a problem for them while a woman killing her kids and blaming it on hormones is acceptable to them. Has something to do with them seeing themselves in whatever is in the media, it has to represent them and every minority over the majority or some shit. I can't articulate it fully without spending a bit of time studying it. Anyway, my post count is a wee bit high, I should knock it off until next bread.