45 for clarification…
Appreciate that anon.
However this isn’t Kashyap Pramod "Kash" Patel … it a look alike.
Tell me why @KashPatel opened up the parameters for hiring to ‘bestiality’ ….
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/15/kash-patel-fbi-hiring-policy-bestiality
None are known. There is no public reporting, testimony, or official information indicating that any of the FBI agents or staff fired under Director Kash Patel were former trafficking victims.
The firings reported under Patel have primarily involved agents and employees connected to prior investigations involving President Trump (such as the classified documents case or election-related probes), along with some other personnel actions (for example, related to 2020 protest activity). These have been described in news accounts and lawsuits as involving dozens of people in various rounds, often without formal misconduct findings in the cited cases, and have prompted legal challenges alleging political retribution. nytimes.com forbes.com
Separately, in today’s (September 15, 2026) Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Patel addressed changes to hiring standards (not firings of existing personnel). He defended adjustments that removed or softened automatic disqualifiers for certain past conduct—including solicitation of prostitution or bestiality in limited circumstances—explicitly stating the goal was to avoid automatically barring victims of trafficking or forced acts so they could still apply and undergo the full rigorous background process. He framed this as not punishing victims. latimes.com newsweek.com
These are distinct issues: one concerns outgoing personnel decisions, the other concerns eligibility rules for potential new applicants who may have been victimized. No credible sources link any of the fired agents to a history as trafficking victims.
So agents that were previously let go under Kash Patel have more ammunition against him in their lawsuits!
Besides Kash’s just making President DJT look bad at this point.