>>25047697LB

>Maybe you would know if this is the same "Jenny More"

>of "task force Orange" George Webb dead partner "whistleblower" fame?

Jenny Moore appears to be the person you were referring to.

She used the online name “Task Force” and was described as an independent investigator/former police officer. Online accounts say she began working with George Webb around 2017–18 and that Webb later published a video titled “A Requiem for Task Force.” Her death was reported as occurring in Washington, D.C., on August 13, 2018.

The important distinction is that “Task Force” was Moore’s alias—it does not appear to mean she was a member of the military/intelligence unit known as Task Force Orange. Claims that she was murdered because of her investigations, or that her death was connected to trafficking allegations, come mainly from partisan or user-generated sources and are not established by the reliable evidence I found. The available memorial record itself labels some details as unverified.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1029378083089014784.html

https://www.noforn.blog/post/alert-the-mysterious-death-of-jenny-marie-moore-and-the-jason-goodman-connection

https://sofrep.com/news/task-force-orange-supporting-delta-force/

https://sofrep.com/author/george-hand/

>>25047911

>90 million people in Iran!

>Trump Concedes He Must Soon Decide On Iran End Game: 'Annihilate Them Or Not'

He already decided, he is sending Israel >

The Trump administration is planning a $2.8 billion arms sale to Israel, not “$2.8 billion worth of bombs.” The package reportedly includes:

40,000 2,000-pound bombs

20,000 MK-84 general-purpose bombs

20,000 BLU-117 bombs

20,000 I-2000 penetrator warheads, designed for hardened or underground targets

The plan was not yet final as of September 15–16, 2026. Congress had been informally notified, and the sale was facing opposition from Sen. Chris Van Hollen and other lawmakers. Most of the purchase would reportedly be financed through U.S. Foreign Military Financing—meaning U.S. taxpayer funds would help Israel buy weapons from American manufacturers.

The proposed shipment is controversial because the Biden administration previously paused delivery of some 2,000-pound bombs over concerns about civilian casualties in Gaza. Trump later lifted that hold. These weapons can cause extensive damage in densely populated areas, and experts have linked similar U.S.-made bombs to strikes in Gaza.

So, in short: Trump’s administration is proposing a $2.8 billion, largely U.S.-financed weapons package centered on 40,000 very large bombs—but it was still going through the congressional process, not necessarily an already completed delivery.

By sale, it's a loan with a special name or program >

Not exactly. The program is most likely Foreign Military Financing (FMF), but FMF is generally a U.S. government grant, not a loan that Israel repays. The money is appropriated by Congress and used to purchase U.S.-made weapons through the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system.

So the structure is:

Congress provides Israel FMF funds.

Israel uses those funds to place an FMS order.

The U.S. government contracts with American defense manufacturers.

Israel receives the weapons without taking on ordinary commercial debt.

“Sale” describes the arms-transfer mechanism; “FMF” describes how it is financed. The $2.8 billion figure refers to the value of the proposed weapons package, not a loan Israel would repay.

There is a separate term, FMS credit financing, which can involve government-backed credit or repayment arrangements, but that is not the usual meaning of FMF and does not appear to be what this reported package refers to.

>>25048024

This is awesome!

Vile false accusations against a Lubavitch Jew.

A Jewish prosecutor, get's the facts, and drops the charges.

The kids, who knows if Jewish? Lied.

Florida, whose Governor went to Israel, to pass legislation for Florida, protecting Jews from hate or speech.

DeSantis is showing, proving how to protect Jews from anti-Semitism for all to see.

This will most likely be cited as precedent for the upcoming, very necessary Noahide laws.

Great job Florida, Govenor DeSantis, and all Jews involved.

This false allegation was probably schemed, to hurt Trump and his known Chabad-Lubavitch allegiance.

You losers will have to do better.

Should those kids be sent to Gaza?

>>25048067

I wonder if the amount of foreigners in our military.

Misaligned with Poland's strong border and immigration policies.

Could pose a detriment to keeping Poland white, and be a progress stopper?

>>25048045

How much will farmers be paid, not to farm, in the pending Farm Bill?

Based on available information, the Agricultural Act of 2026 (the pending Farm Bill) has advanced through the Senate Agriculture Committee as of September 2026.

However, specific updated payment rates per acre for farmers to remove land from production are not yet finalized or widely published in the current public summaries.

Payments for "not farming" are primarily handled through the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), a voluntary program where the government pays farmers to remove environmentally sensitive land from agricultural production and plant species that improve wildlife habitat and water quality.

While the exact rates for the 2026 Act are pending, these programs typically determine payments based on:

Rental Payments: Annual payments based on the land's rental value.

Cost-Share: Financial assistance to cover the cost of establishing the conservation practices.

Land Eligibility: The environmental benefit the land provides (e.g., soil erosion risk).

The pending legislation aims to update these conservation programs to better impact wildlife habitat and hunting and fishing access.

For the most current specific rates for your region, the Farm Service Agency (FSA) provides official enrollment and payment data.

If you mean the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)—the program commonly described as paying farmers “not to farm”—the pending Farm Bill does not set one nationwide payment.

The Senate draft would:

Reauthorize CRP through 2031.

Recalculate rental rates to favor marginal land over highly productive cropland.

Raise the annual CRP payment limit from the current limit to $125,000 per participant or entity. That is a ceiling, not a guaranteed payment.

Actual payments are calculated per acre using county rental values and soil productivity. Current national averages are roughly:

General CRP: $57 per acre per year

Continuous CRP: $148 per acre per year

Grasslands CRP: nearly $16 per acre per year

Rates vary enormously by location—for example, recent averages ranged from under $16 per acre in Wyoming to about $260 in Iowa for general CRP.

So, a farmer enrolling 500 acres at the national general-CRP average would receive approximately $28,500 per year, plus any applicable incentives and cost-sharing—not $125,000 automatically.

The Senate committee advanced its bill on September 16, 2026, but it remains pending; the House and Senate versions still must be reconciled and enacted.

https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2026/06/senate-agriculture-committee-releases-draft-text-for-2026-farm-bill

https://www.fb.org/intel/markets/reviewing-trends-in-conservation-reserve-program-enrollment

https://www.trcp.org/2026/09/16/new-farm-bill-advances-in-senate-committee-key-impacts-for-hunters-anglers/

https://www.trcp.org/

https://www.fsa.usda.gov/

>>25048134

When "the military is the only way".

And the Civilian (President, CIC, head of executive branch)

is reluctant or unwilling to order it so,

how does the military begin maneuvers?

In last bread, I showed UCMJ does not act on DOJ

sealed indictments or Grand Jury testimony.

If nor order from CIC, what would they be acting on,

constitutionally or legally?

How would congress on break have anything to do with it?

>>25048187

The US of A, all of government, is far removed from the founding documents.

I find it surprising they would want to point out all the ways they are repugnant of them.

False nostalgia, uphold illegitimate powers, or humiliation ritual?

Maybe all three is best answer.

The individual states are another story.

Original intent would be all powers not enumerated for federal government, belong to the states.

When the Senators became elected, instead of appointed by elected representatives, it was all broken.

Of course that was 1913 ratifying the 17th, when a majority of other violations occurred.

Many claim the Act of 1871 was the nail in the coffin.

Then their is Marbury v. Madison 1803 https://www.archives.gov/

The government cannot remake the government because it will not roll back it's power.

What is the solution?

>>25048315

What part did I get wrong?

Or do you not like being questioned?

Please enlighten the room.

>>25048318

>How anon?

If I had a good answer I would have stated it.

that's why I asked, on the chance someone had considered it before.

If you were to reread post, perhaps you would put together the reason for the ?,?

>>25048344

Does Law of War Manual provide for the military to act without congress or president orders?

No. The DoD Law of War Manual does not give the military an independent power to act without lawful authority from the political branches. It is a statement of the Department of Defense’s legal views and guidance for applying the law of war—not a source of command authority or a substitute for the Constitution, federal statutes, presidential orders, or applicable rules of engagement. The manual itself says it does not necessarily reflect the views of the entire U.S. government and may later be revised.

The basic division is:

Congress has powers including declaring war, authorizing military force, funding the military, and regulating the armed forces.

The President is Commander in Chief and directs military operations through the chain of command.

Military commanders and service members may act under existing orders, standing rules of engagement, delegated authority, or the inherent right and duty of immediate self-defense.

Thus, a service member or commander may respond immediately to an attack without waiting for a new order. The President also has generally recognized authority to repel a sudden attack or protect U.S. forces and citizens in limited circumstances without prior congressional authorization. But that is not the same as the military deciding independently to start a war or conduct an operation outside lawful orders.

Congress also does not normally issue tactical orders directly. It establishes legal authority—such as an authorization for use of military force—while the President and the military chain of command execute operations under that authority. Whether a particular action is lawful depends on factors such as existing authorization, the nature and duration of the operation, self-defense, domestic law, and the rules of engagement.

https://lieber.westpoint.edu/july-2023-revision-dod-law-war-manual-customary-international-law/

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-i/clauses/753

https://www.fcnl.org/warpowers

>>25048365

>member the transfer of power

>in DC

Please explain, or Date, or reference of speech.

Are you referring to the returning the power to the people, by PDJT?

>the fences the masked black general

If fences were up was it to keep the people from the seat of power, or the corruptors in?

I am not remembering a masked black general, please enlighten me.

>>25048389

What military are you referencing?

Are you implying that a well regulated militia exists?

If so, and well regulated, why is it unknown?

>>25048414

Your quick reference was far faster thank you.

The mask was because of mask mandates.

National Guard are held to Law of War manual.