https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/09/18/what-comes-first-the-ai-false-flag-or-the-lawsuits-against-the-ai-developers/

What Comes First: The AI False Flag or The Lawsuits Against The AI Developers?

That’s ultimately the question at the heart of the matter.What will come first, the AI false flag event that will trigger support for government regulation that includes liability protection; or the lawsuits against the AI developers for stealing intellectual property?

How you place your bet will likely determine your investment decision.

<snip>

Will the Silicon Valley/Leftist-Govt win through regulatory control under the guise of ‘trust and safety’. Or will the larger population see through the scheme and align with liberty, freedom and the free-market approach.

Place your bets.

###

Related:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO0A2ipLX7M&t=90s

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2026/09/18/bokhari-we-must-pace-the-frontier-of-government-power-grabs/

We Must Pace the Frontier of Government Power-Grabs

What do the Federal Reserve, the Patriot Act, Net Zero, COVID lockdown policies, foreign disinformation, and the proposed, globally-coordinated AI slowdown have in common?

Every item on the list was preceded by a crisis, either real or imagined, planting an existential fear in the minds of the public. This created the justification for a massive, globally-coordinated government response.

<snip>

The FISA courts that were expanded in the name of fighting Islamic terrorism were later used to enable deep state spying on a domestic presidential campaign. COVID lockdowns, established in response to a frightening virus we knew little about, persisted long after cases like Sweden, Florida, and Texas, proved their superfluousness. Net Zero policies, created in response to the never-ending climate change emergency, have left Europe economically crippled and dependent on foreign energy.

<snip>

And the current frontier is AI regulation. In the space of two weeks, we’ve seen the two leading AI companies – OpenAI and Anthropic – demand the government step in to collectively slow the industry down. This followed the resignation of an Anthropic researcher on the grounds that superintelligent AI could “kill us all,” a statement which attracted over a hundred million views on social media and was aired on primetime channels across the world.

Almost immediately, the global governance machine sprang to life. 70 UK Parliamentarians demanded a ban on superintelligent AI. Former president Barack Obama and former Vice President Kamala Harris joined in. Another British politician urged the United Nations to intervene.

And just a few days before the resignation of the Anthropic researcher, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) introduced legislation that would ban AI superintelligence and establish a new agency at the federal level dedicated to AI safety. Anyone who violated the bill provisions by developing frontier AI models without the blessing of the government would face up to twenty years in prison.

Most suspiciously of all, Netflix decided to drop an AI apocalypse documentary, just two days ago, featuring interviews with the very people demanding government intervention to prevent the AI doom scenario: Dario Amodei, Sam Altman, Eliezer Yudkowsky, and more. Netflix documentaries, of course, take quite a bit of time to make, which has fed allegations of coordination.

<more>

###

It's a good read.

>>25051847

A vaguely-defined existential fear, a unified media response (complete with a ready-to-go Netflix documentary), followed by interventions from the likes of Obama and Harris, and proposals to establish a new government agency.

Rather like the financial crisis of 1907, which saw the creation of the Federal Reserve. Or 9/11, which saw the establishment of DHS and the expansion of FISA courts – both of which were later turned on the American public. Or the largely imagined “Russian disinformation” panic of 2017, which saw the massive expansion of government-funded “counter-disinformation” programs that resulted in the mass censorship of Americans (including the current President, as well as the current HHS secretary). A crisis, real or imagined, followed by inexorable pressure for government expansion.

>>25051847

>>25051866

1) The Whom

A key element of Dario Amodei’s call to “pace the frontier” is for all AI companies to grant access to “embedded evaluators who have employee-like access to verify safety practices and report incidents.”

We’ve seen this movie before. It started with external “trust and safety” councils who had access to content moderation systems at platforms like Twitter, whose members included LGBT and feminist activist groups. It ended with a vast, globe-spanning blob of trust and safety, brand safety, and counter-disinformation orgs, often funded to the tune of millions of dollars by U.S. government agencies, which resulted in the mass censorship of social media.

We have every reason to believe that the “AI evaluators” that Amodei wants embedded in every company are the exact same types of people. His preferred watchdog, Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR) is run by a CEO who – standing in front of a power point presentation featuring migrants on a raft – said that future generations would be “embarrassed” that nations “barred people from a location” based on “where they happen to be born – their nationality.”

That’s the CEO of the company that Amodei wants to be embedded in every single AI company – embarrassed by the existence of national borders.

To make matters worse, we don’t know who’s funding METR. The nonprofit has raised a staggering $71 million over the course of just six months, but researchers scouring the money trail have accounted for just $350,000 of it. The rest, for now, appears to be dark.