Federal overrides State
If the NG were called into Federal service then Newsome and Sacramento have no say
Smells a bit like insurrection
Any History buffs around?
I wonder if those antics could get California declared a "State in rebellion" under the Reconstruction Act or some other law?
White for everyday and the yellow for special occasions
Multiple variations of shit
Wild shit, crazy shit, funny shit, funky shit, groovy shit, and bits of nasty shit
First pic: Waste of ICY, padded cell more efficient
Second pic: That bunch only exists to be replacement organs for Boomers and Gen X
Third pic: First Teslas good, then Teslas bad, so Teslas good again?
>>25058301 (me)
ICU, not ICY, I may be too sober for this stuff at present
>The acceleration of the controlled demolition of America, against Americans.
That's fine, will make things easier
>The expansion of the American Hemisphere for globalism.
No, Second Foundation stage for the new Empire
>The reorganizing of the world order to 10 kingdoms.
Good luck with that
>The pace of suffering, to usher in, done in 30 = 2030.
Seattle and NYC must collapse or the morans won't learn
>I will most likely be removed by then, otherwise I would enjoy watching PDJT say he is the President, Zelensky style, we are at war and no election can proceed for 2028.
So Schiff, Shimer, and Pelosi have a catastrophic stroke on the same day? Sweet
>PDJT delivering on his promise Christians will never need to vote again.
The Wicca and the Druids are totally fine with that
>In the lead up though we do have famine and fire to look forward to.
So EBT gone for good and the looters torch the stores to create food deserts, groovy
In my area not only brick and mortar establishments but farmer's markets and sometimes the dude that has boiled peanuts shows up roadside near that one church
The same Bloomberg that has spent years with "Orange Man Bad?"
I suppose it's close enough to Mid-Terms to throw shade. Not like there is any actual platform to put forward, just TDS
They will be just fine
Besides the affection to regulate everything I'm kinda hoping when the sheeple trust AI more than MSM and get rebuffed on their more idiotic opinions, thus causing a loss of control
They are gonna be just fine
The trucks will be running
Continue to doom and gloom
Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals
What is really interesting about the use of Alinsky’s simplistic tactics is that they were designed to be used by people with low intelligence – those whose lips move when they read. If they EVER read. Tools and fools. CNN’s audience.
Watch any video where the regular liberal “marchers” get interviewed and you will find that they can go no further, in a thought process, then the words they heard on CNN. They don’t have a message. They have a memorized chant which they cannot explain, or enlarge on. These people have no idea of what a concept is. They are very likely, these days, to be vaccine damaged.
When you understand this actuality, these Alinsky people become fun to watch.
RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”
Meanwhile forgetting:
RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
Shills are convinced of the "keep at it, eventually it will work" tactic not realizing Anons shift into "oh, this shit again" mode very rapidly
I like how those that claim to be progressive rely on outdated methods from the last century
They were designed to deal with a political situation in existence during the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s – a world totally different from today. Yet, many activist groups laud these tactics without realizing their in-appropriateness in the 2020 world.
What Alinsky, and his followers, failed to comprehend is that they created a whole generation of people who cannot see beyond screaming criticism and offer any modern day solutions to social problems beyond a social shift to the hungry and dreary world of socialism/communism – something they definitely do not actually want to happen.
The counter reaction to this situation has been the rise of the humongous populist movement that elected Donald Trump. This group doesn’t put up with Alinsky-like nonsense. They outnumber the Alinski-ites 100,000 to 1.
>reality be what it do
I propose the politicians that did the mandate shit be taken to the cleaners for wrongful death suits
A nice thing would be Eminent Domain over those large estates they and some business execs have so the grounds can be used for cemetaries. The mansions can be dual use mausoleum and living quarters for the homeless veterans hired as groundskeepers on nice salaries funded by the dipshits that thought the mask & faceshield combo (among other stupidity) was a good idea. At least until the dipshits have themselves a "coincidence" cause by climate change and need a plot themselves
Lindsay Clancy support or the more common "you only do bare minimum for me" entitlement shite coming from the digital sisterhood of ran-throughs and hags?
Sauceless drivel
Hormuz Route Negotiations Would Have Handed Entry and Exit Control to Iran
The deal would have given substantial concessions to Iran - but the diplomatic process is now holed beneath the waterline.
An IRGC minelaying boat in years past (IRGC)An IRGC minelaying boat in years past (IRGC)
Published Sep 16, 2026 2:15 PM by The Maritime Executive
Several different developments taking place in recent days indicate that diplomacy and negotiation are not going to bring warfare in the Gulf to an end anytime soon, either in the conflict involving Iran and nor in Yemen. For the maritime community, the scene appears set for a continuation and a worsening of the current pattern of naval action, blockades and of attacks on civilian shipping.
This week, the long-running negotiation between Iran and Oman came to a head, with GCC countries unwilling to accept the compromise which Iran and Oman had agreed. When the terms were understood, it appears a set of concessions had been made to Iran which thoroughly compromised the established UNCLOS arrangements governing the Strait of Hormuz itself, but also international standards pertaining to innocent passage through narrows and territorial waters.
Under the new arrangements, while the single new channel through the Strait was to pass through both Iranian and Omani territorial waters, the entrances to the channel at both ends were to be in the waters of Iran, giving Iran a veto over who should pass. Oman also appears to have surrendered the right to allow use of its own territorial waters for innocent passage.
What is particularly shocking is that the United States was kept abreast of the negotiations and appears to have been ready to agree these arrangements. Unsurprisingly, the remaining GCC states were unwilling to countenance even discussion of such a plan, which would have compromised their ability to trade, export and choose their own security partners, as well as leaving intact Iran’s threatening drone and missile capability and its program of regional expansionism.
In effect, the agreement was to have been an endorsement of Iran’s seizure of political suzerainty over the Gulf, as was evident in a description in Mehr News the preceding day of how Iran thought the conference was going to go in Salalah – the GCC representatives were to be ‘informed of the new arrangements’ as a fait accompli, denied an opportunity to discuss or object, and their presence would be advertised to the international community as being ‘tacit non-objection’ to the arrangements. It would have been akin to a surrender ceremony. Having walked away from the Salalah conference, the Gulf States now know that if they want to protect their own national sovereignty, they are going to have to fight for it.
In Yemen, the GCC countries have also understood that the Houthi undertaking offered to President Trump not to attack American interests was a means of putting off US intervention – at least until the Houthis had consolidated their military objectives, by which time they would have been in a stronger position to resist any American military counter-move. This cynical stratagem, using the offer of negotiation and diplomacy as a means of neutralizing a rescue intervention, while pressing on undisturbed with their own military action, could have been a ploy the Houthis learnt from 1938 and 1939. Here too the GCC countries have learned that if they want to defend their interests they will need to learn to fight on their own to do so.
The Iranians have always been skilled at the art of negotiation, and at using the deceptive practice of taqiyya. They have also taught their Houthi allies well. Invariably the Iranians concede very little during a negotiation while making a great play of doing so. Rarely do they follow through with promises or undertakings made. But at the same time they extract concessions from the other side, which is usually unwilling to fight as hard as the Iranians would for vital interests.
Reports carried by Axios quoting Israeli sources suggest that CENTCOM held a conference last week in Germany, most likely at the US airbase in Rammstein, to which the Chiefs of Staff of all the GCC states (less Oman), plus Egypt and Jordan, were invited. At the conference, the commander of CENTCOM apparently assured attendees that the United States would not withdraw militarily from the region and would expand safe passage for ships through the Strait of Hormuz. This was in other words an encouragement to carry on resisting.
The presence at the conference of the Israeli Chief of Staff Lt Gen Eyal Zamir may have been to offer short-term practical support, but he will certainly have explained that Israel has red lines which if crossed will trigger Israeli intervention. Many of these red lines concur with GCC interests, and this will also have reassured many in his audience.
Many involved in the Gulf conflict have hoped that negotiation will lead to a solution without further hostilities. Recent events suggest this is a false hope, albeit one which Iran has sought to exploit. In the short term therefore, there is little prospect of a ceasefire leading to a negotiated settlement.
In the meantime, Iran is suffering a desperate shortage of the funds it needs to keep a grip on power at home, a consequence of the 100%-effective US naval blockade. Iran will seek to wriggle free of the blockade by increasing its attacks on shipping, on US regional bases and on GCC infrastructure. But while the US Navy can maintain its blockade with little risk of casualties, for Iran a lifting of that blockade becomes more and more urgent: the IRGC needs the means to pay for the loyalty of its core supporters and the subsidies that keep down popular unrest.
https://maritime-executive.com/editorials/hormuz-route-negotiations-would-have-handed-substantial-control-to-iran
>>25058519 (me)
This part here makes me wonder where the info actually came from:
What is particularly shocking is that the United States was kept abreast of the negotiations and appears to have been ready to agree these arrangements.
I'm having visions of caravans of moose with oil barrels strapped to them trudging through Canadian blizzard
That was the best you could think of?
What is the Relationship Between Incarceration of Children and Adult Health Outcomes?
Most individuals in the child incarceration category were male, although a lower proportion than those first incarcerated at age 15–17 (p=0.06). Significant racial/ethnic differences were observed by age of incarceration (p<0.001). Specifically, white participants were comparatively less represented in the child incarceration category than at other ages, while black, Hispanic, and “other” youth were comparatively more represented. A trend towards lower household income was observed for youth first incarcerated at younger ages (p=0.051). Differences across family household structure type were significant (p=0.003), with individuals in the child incarceration category more likely to be from single parent households (40.7%) compared to two-biological parent households (17.7%).
More:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6309510/
The Fatherless Generation
My Analysis-Hope for the FatherlessMy StoryYour StoryBibliography
Statistics
63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes (US Dept. Of Health/Census) – 5 times the average.
90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average.
85% of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Center for Disease Control)
80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes –14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26)
71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report)
Father Factor in Drug and Alcohol Abuse – Researchers at Columbia University found that children living in two-parent household with a poor relationship with their father are 68% more likely to smoke, drink, or use drugs compared to all teens in two-parent households. Teens in single mother households are at a 30% higher risk than those in two-parent households.
70% of youths in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sept. 1988)
85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction)
Father Factor in Incarceration – Even after controlling for income, youths in father-absent households still had significantly higher odds of incarceration than those in mother-father families. Youths who never had a father in the household experienced the highest odds. A 2002 Department of Justice survey of 7,000 inmates revealed that 39% of jail inmates lived in mother-only households. Approximately forty-six percent of jail inmates in 2002 had a previously incarcerated family member. One-fifth experienced a father in prison or jail.
Father Factor in Crime – A study of 109 juvenile offenders indicated that family structure significantly predicts delinquency. Adolescents, particularly boys, in single-parent families were at higher risk of status, property and person delinquencies. Moreover, students attending schools with a high proportion of children of single parents are also at risk. A study of 13,986 women in prison showed that more than half grew up without their father. Forty-two percent grew up in a single-mother household and sixteen percent lived with neither parent
Father Factor in Child Abuse – Compared to living with both parents, living in a single-parent home doubles the risk that a child will suffer physical, emotional, or educational neglect. The overall rate of child abuse and neglect in single-parent households is 27.3 children per 1,000, whereas the rate of overall maltreatment in two-parent households is 15.5 per 1,000.
Daughters of single parents without a Father involved are 53% more likely to marry as teenagers, 711% more likely to have children as teenagers, 164% more likely to have a pre-marital birth and 92% more likely to get divorced themselves.
Adolescent girls raised in a 2 parent home with involved Fathers are significantly less likely to be sexually active than girls raised without involved Fathers.
43% of US children live without their father [US Department of Census]
90% of homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]
80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes. [Criminal Justice & Behaviour, Vol 14, pp. 403-26, 1978]
71% of pregnant teenagers lack a father. [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services press release, Friday, March 26, 1999]
63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]
85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. [Center for Disease Control]
90% of adolescent repeat arsonists live with only their mother. [Wray Herbert, “Dousing the Kindlers,” Psychology Today, January, 1985, p. 28]
71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. [National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools]
75% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes. [Rainbows f for all God’s Children]
70% of juveniles in state operated institutions have no father. [US Department of Justice, Special Report, Sept. 1988]
85% of youths in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. [Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Department of Corrections, 1992]
Fatherless boys and girls are: twice as likely to drop out of high school; twice as likely to end up in jail; four times more likely to need help for emotional or behavioral problems. [US D.H.H.S. news release, March 26, 1999]
More:
https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/
>its about men learning their place and get them back to being protectors/providers/and lovers.
Nope, the Traditional ways are reserved for Traditional women
She doesn't know Appreciation, Respect, or Support than she can have her boxes of wine and cats. Keep her chaos, drama, baggage, and attitude problems in her own dwelling, accompanied by the Silence
Pro-Tip: The bad boys stay the bad boys.
The men you have access to are not the high quality you will claim you deserve
The good men for the most part have checked out of the dating market and no longer want females around to mess things up
Peace won out over Pussy