Thank you, Baker.
Fight, fight, fight!
o7
As summer turns to fall tomorrow night, I want to pause and salute theSummer of 2026, also known as theSummer of Justice. It will forever be known as the very best summer in the history of the United States of America.
Happy Fall. The season begins tomorrow night at 2004 hours (8:04 p.m.) and will one day be remembered as theFall of the Deep State.
Thank you, God, for the strength and guidance you give all who are working so hard to rid the world of the evil that has been killing our loved ones and us.
Fight, fight, fight.
o7
>Trump TV
>24/7
I'll stream it! I'm always looking for good things to stream to keep me company while I work.
Thank you, President Trump and White House!
o7
Boston federal judge sides with Tufts after they fired Christian ER doc for refusing to get the COVID jab
LINK - https://www.massdailynews.com/2026/09/21/boston-federal-judge-tufts-christian-er-doctor-covid-jab-religious-discrimination?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=mdn_tweet&utm_content=headline
ARCHIVE - ARCHIVING NOT POSSIBLE (I tried multiple sites, multiple times)
Boston federal judge sides with Tufts after they fired Christian ER doc for refusing to get the COVID jab
BOSTON — Tufts Medical Center was within its rights to fire a Christian emergency room doctor of 29 years for refusing to get the COVID jab, a Boston federal judge has ruled.
Even the judge conceded that the science on the vaccine "may have evolved."
Dr. Theresa Gabana, 61, was hustled out the door on Dec. 5, 2021, after nearly three decades in the Tufts emergency room.
Her sin, per court records: she told the hospital her Christian faith would not let her take a shot developed with, or tested upon, aborted human fetal cell lines.
Tufts's Exemption Committee said no.
Gabana appealed.
They said no again.
She was gone by Christmas.
She sued in October 2024, seeking at least $6 million and citing religious discrimination under Title VII and Massachusetts state law.
The case was moved from state to federal court.
Senior US District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, a George H.W. Bush appointee on the Boston federal bench since 1992, granted Tufts's motions for summary judgment and to strike parts of her affidavit on Sept. 15.
Universal Hub first reported the ruling.
"The Court is sympathetic to Plaintiff's position," Gorton wrote in his 15-page ruling. "She faced a difficult choice between her sincerely held beliefs and her livelihood."
Then he ruled against her.
Gorton found Tufts had cleared the "undue hardship" bar.
Dr. Gabana's job was to see patients: sew up wounds, drain abscesses, staple scalp lacerations, splint fractures.
She could not do that if she would not take the jab.
Her offer to keep working masked and gloved, as she had done throughout 2020 and the first half of 2021, was "unavailing as a matter of law," per the judge.
Then came the twist.
"The developing understanding of COVID-19, including what has since been learned about possible adverse effects and limitations of the vaccine, may cast doubt on Tufts Medical's decision in retrospect," Gorton wrote.
But he ruled that Title VII law forced him to weigh the situation as it stood in August 2021, "rather than their appearance in hindsight."
"That the science may have evolved does not render the contemporaneous judgment of Tufts Medical unreasonable," Gorton wrote. "The Hospital was operating under significant uncertainty, facing a surge in patient demand, acute staffing pressure and reliance on the then-best available public health guidance."
The court also struck a section of Gabana's own affidavit that cited an August 2021 news article quoting then-CDC director Rochelle Walensky acknowledging that vaccinated people could still transmit COVID-19.
Gorton ruled the reference was hearsay because a news article is not an official CDC record.
Gabana is not alone.
She is one of at least five Massachusetts hospital workers whose religious discrimination suits over COVID vaccine firings have been kicked by federal judges in this state.
It's a pattern that has held even through the Supreme Court's 2023 Groff v. DeJoy decision, which was supposed to raise the bar employers must clear to deny religious accommodations.
In a footnote, Gorton cited four other Massachusetts federal rulings that landed the same way: Munroe v. Boston Medical Center, Cyr v. Boston Medical Center, Lavine v. Mass General Brigham, and Anastos v. Boston Medical Center, all decided in 2025.
Gabana's attorney, Richard Chambers of Lynnfield, has been on the losing end of a string of Massachusetts COVID-era lawsuits.
Those include cases against hospital vaccine mandates, Boston's brief 2022 requirement to show vaccination proof to enter indoor public spaces, and North End restaurant pandemic-era fee cases.