https://pastebin.com/pvMtDx0m

Dough

BO, I am a baker… do you want me to take the next bake?

>>2507307 see:

>>2507303

I got it for you. I was preparing an eBake

>>2507318

I saw an ebake, and this one was very late, so I thought maybe we were bakerless. You can keep it, CB, if you like.

BO, can you czech me?

Just to prep for a bake in case of more computer problems.

>>2507357

It looks like bookBot. Usually, they make him do Mein Kampf. Just filter, if you are so inclined. BO will likely delete them all shortly.

>>2507391

ShariaBlew panhandled enough money to pay their internet and electric bills for this month.

>>2507410

>>2507378

Baker, you have backup if needed

>>2507342

NameFags don't belong in the bread.

Not Notable

>>2507342

What the CA.gov website doesn’t say is that this declaration gives the Military and the NSA legality to fully operate inside the borders of California under dodd 5525.5. Department of Defense Directive goes on to state the military will support local law enforcement agencies.

Where's the sauce for that statement? Where is the link to this fictional directive?

Not Notable

>>2507462

Please give me the sauce for the fictional "DoD Directive 5" from the article. Just some assClown making shit up.

>>2507484

Note all the one-post wonders saying this unsauced bullshit is "notable."

Where is the link/sauce to the fictional "Directive 5?"

Not a single fuqqing autist on the board right now. Just a bunch of shills and sheep. Note this bullshit pops up the same time goreShill, MuhBlackDickShill, and bookBot show up.

There are no coincidences.

Directive 5 bullshit unsauced crap is NOT Notable

>>2507583

>and if you're TZ, is understood you never want to bake kek).

Understood.

>>2507342, >>2507546, >>2507503 Anon believes D5 5.5 pertains to DoD Directive 5525; allows NSA to operate in CA due to fires

I rescind my objections.

Baker Notable

Suggested text above, if not too long.

>>2507711

>>2507694

>>2507831

Baker

There's enough sauce there, I believe, to at least put it in the notables. Let other anons follow-up or debunk. Maybe there is such a directive on an official site. It's a good fake, if it isn't real.

>>2507866

Did you see my edits in the other thread? I didn't finish them, but I did probably 70% of the document.

>>2507685, >>2507884, >>2507886 Disinifo Act funding and other fuckery

Baker notable

>>2507840, >>2507685, >>2507884, >>2507886 Disinifo Act funding and other fuckery

Baker Notable, amended