It is also unnecessary and irrelevant for this board's topic
Maybe an Alex Jones board would be more suitable?
Keep us posted on your futile quest
Count mine as a "yawn"
Is this a screen scrap of Yahoo News?
Feel free to report back to us once you get some incrimination evidence.
I get too tired chasing wild geese
You were aware that such an authorization would expire on Sept 30, 2017?
That is the end of the Federal fiscal year and funding does not roll forward, because authorization to spend expires.
But I am sure you learned that in school?
Reason the believe that :
you are a "party: traitor!!
you voted against your own interests
you are uneducated
you are a straight white male
you are a Nazi
HR means "House suggestion
S means "Senate suggestion
When the two are merged along with any jointly agreed amendments it becomes Public Law xxxx
None of this listed are "laws" but only the bills passed by each chamber that have to be combine and accept by both.
"Reconciliation" blends the two together since they are rarely identical.
But you probably already know that as an informed citizen and voter?
Let the media harass both of them.
I hope they both become invited guests on all the lefty media shows.
That will be fun to watch, but better when the real story come out
They are both out of the loop here so can even talk about anything current.
Which one of the youtube poseurs are you?
It is like Elvis imitators.
All sound different, say different and contradictory things but all look a sorta like Elvis.
The one thing the all have in common is none of the is the real one (just like all the Anonymous impersonators)
You here to threaten us with you mad skilz?
That would just be embarrassing for you.
Take your best shot
Homeless brown rodents living on the streets in LA?
Definitely Nephilum
Sorry- thought you were under educated American LOL
A bill was passed but funds can only be spent in the current fiscal year and every Authorization to spend expires (except for things like military multi-years contracts that are accounted for as paid out.
As such, the Republican we in control of both chambers and some one posted that the didn't authorize any funding.
Net result - empty bucket some one could put funding in, and then us the details of the bill on how they could spent.
Intentionally vague leaves lost of discretion for the Council to pay 3rd party contractors or hire employees. Contractor lets them funnel money to friendly organizations with little oversight and no competitive bidding.
Common practice (sadly) to use tax $$ to fund their political allies
Hope that helps but ask more if necessary.
Refreshing to find the few who try to learn here rather than to entertain and amuse, or push pet theories
In Bankruptcy Court they will be referred to as Petitioners
Corsi is like a drunk who gets lost going home and wanders into different houses
The Donald is his new pad