RUNWAY

The Real Reason Hillary Clinton Wore Purple For Her Concession Speech

BY STEFF YOTKA

September 10, 2017

On November 9, Hillary Clinton took the stage in New York to give her concession speech in a slate gray and vibrant purple suit by Ralph Lauren. Her husband, President Bill Clinton, stood beside her in a coordinating tie. It was a new look for Hillary—typically she had favored patriotic red, white, or blue during the campaign—and one that many speculated about for weeks after. Was she signaling optimism, sorrow, majesty, or mourning?

In Clinton’s new memoir, What Happened, she explains her choice. “The morning after the election, Bill and I both wore purple. It was a nod to bipartisanship (blue plus red equals purple).”

Clinton also wrote about the outfit she would have worn had the election turned out different. “The night before, I had hoped to thank the country wearing white—the color of the suffragettes—while standing on a stage cut into the shape of the United States under a vast glass ceiling. Instead, the white suit stayed in the garment bag.”

>>25074733

>>25074733

https://www.vogue.com/article/hillary-clinton-purple-suit-concession-speech

Bullshit.

The purple was messaging

prior to riots and other bullshit to begin.

Hillary and Bill were symbolically speaking to all the traitors inside our government left and right “appearing”…to “start shit now”.

And all the ones around the country also, left and right “appearing”.

It is one sick club.

Red and Blue.

Purple Diary peeps.

Purple Revolution shit.

KNOWINGLY.

>>25074733

The morning after the election, Bill and I both wore purple.

>It was a nod to bipartisanship (blue plus red equals purple).”

Clinton also wrote about the outfit she would have worn had the election turned out different. “The night before, I had hoped to thank the country wearing white—the color of the suffragettes—while standing on a stage cut into the shape of the United States under a vast glass ceiling. Instead, the white suit stayed in the garment bag

>>25074733

>>25074743

Kek

Clinton also wrote about the outfit she would have worn had the election turned out different. “The night before,

I had hoped to thank the country wearing white—the color of the suffragettes—while standing on a stage cut into the shape of the United States under a vast glass ceiling.

Instead,

the white suit stayed in the garment bag.

>>25074745 you must be new.

Think Mirror.

We have playbook, remember. We throw their way and symbology BACK at them via media. THEY know that HE knows their mechanisms.

It is a FU to the sick club.

A hahahahhhhhhaaahha.

Via their own mechanism, the news media.

The sick club HATES the symbolism slap back at them.

Trump does this DAILY.

>>25074744

>>25074743

>>25074744

https://youtu.be/0ofvuywJf1o

Suffragette City

"Suffragette City" is a 1972 glam rock song by David Bowie that describes a fictional, hedonistic urban world of sex, youth rebellion, and rock-and-roll excess rather than a literal place related to the women's suffrage movement.Core Meaning and ThemesFictional Setting: "Suffragette City" is not about women's voting rights. Instead, it represents a mythic, high-energy nightlife environment where the album's alien protagonist, Ziggy Stardust, experiences Earth's chaotic sexuality and glamour.The Narrative: The lyrics feature the narrator brushing off acquaintances ("Henry" and a "droogie," a nod to Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange) to make room for a romantic encounter. The famous refrain ("Don't lean on me, man, 'cause you can't afford the ticket back from Suffragette City") acts as a warning that this decadent lifestyle is intense, exclusive, and costly.Cultural Influences: The song blends 1950s rock-and-roll piano (reminiscent of Little Richard) with futuristic glam imagery, slang from A Clockwork Orange ("droogie"), and explosive guitar work.BackgroundRejection by Mott the Hoople: David Bowie originally wrote the track for the band Mott the Hoople to save them from breaking up. When they turned it down in favor of "All the Young Dudes," Bowie kept it for his landmark album The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars.Release: It first came out in April 1972 as the B-side to the hit single "Starman" before becoming a staple of glam rock.

Hillary planned on wearing a white suit as a nod to women's suffrage. It actually would have been a nod to the sick club.

>>25074763

Stardust, experiences Earth's chaotic sexuality

The famous refrain ("Don't lean on me, man, 'cause you can't afford the ticket back from Suffragette City") acts as a warning that this decadent lifestyle is intense, exclusive, and costly.

slang from A Clockwork Orange ("droogie")

MK

>>25074744

>>25074733

>>25074743

>>25074745

>>25074763

>>25074765 THEY are all in the same club.

That is the point. Retard.

Even Bowie.

This is decades and decades old shit.

>>25074765

No. Just remind you that maybe you forgot all of the old poasts and why we are even here.

>>25074765 nope

>>25074768

A jailhose convo/ rant from Harvey to whomever visiting him, hidden meanings conveyed/ deciphered, outside convo next person, to next person, to next person, to Candace media team, trickled way to Candace idea and series about Harvey?

See how it works.

>>25074766

>>25074766

IF

Candace Owens—or any podcaster—were proven to have accepted $1.75 million from Harvey Weinstein to intentionally influence or contaminate a jury, she could face severe state and federal criminal charges, including obstruction of justice, jury tampering, and conspiracy. However, it is critical to note that while prosecutors revealed jailhouse recordings of Weinstein offering $1.75 million to an unnamed podcaster, there is currently no evidence that Owens accepted any money, and her spokesperson has firmly denied that she was ever paid by Weinstein.If such an arrangement were hypothetically proven true, the following legal consequences would likely occur:Potential Criminal ChargesObstruction of Justice: If a person releases content with the explicit, documented intent to unlawfully disrupt court proceedings, tamper with a trial's integrity, or "contaminate a jury pool" as prosecutors alleged, they can be charged with state or federal obstruction of justice. This offense carries heavy penalties, often resulting in significant prison time.Jury Tampering / Misconduct: Attempting to influence a juror outside of normal court procedures is a crime. If a media figure coordinates directly with a defendant to target or reach seated jurors with outside media to sway their verdict, they could be charged with jury tampering or procuring juror misconduct.Conspiracy: Agreeing with an incarcerated defendant to execute an illegal scheme to subvert a trial constitutes a criminal conspiracy. Both the person offering the money and the person accepting it would be legally liable.Financial and Asset PenaltiesAsset Forfeiture: If a person accepts money to commit a felony, the federal or state government can seize those funds as "proceeds of a crime." The $1.75 million would likely be confiscated through asset forfeiture laws.Criminal Fines: Beyond prison time, convictions for obstruction or conspiracy typically carry massive financial penalties imposed by the court.Civil LiabilityLawsuits from Victims: Weinstein's accusers or the prosecution could argue that the coordinated media campaign caused further emotional distress or successfully disrupted their right to a fair trial, opening the door for civil lawsuits.

>>25074759

Presley Gerber was born on July 2, 1999 at the age of 27.

John F. Kennedy Jr. died on July 16, 1999, at the age of 38

>>25074794

*died age 27

>>25074794

>>25074759

So which poast set off the porn spammer.

Which poast is over a target.