dChan
Anonymous ID: 620d3d Aug. 8, 2018, 1:29 a.m. No.2508101   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8108 >>8205 >>8223

Two ways we can stop HR 5181 /not sitting on your ass and wait for miracle/

 

1) Lawsuit against congress for usurping the constitution and it needs to be heard by the supreme court.

 

2) * Tell your new/old elected representatives HR 5181 must be REPEALED *** Here must be some good lawyers who can prepare some ULTIMATE LETTER, which everyone here would send to their representatives in SENATE/HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

 

Here are four key areas that social media companies must address to begin to rectify their credibility problem:

 

  1. Provide Transparency: We need detailed information so everyone can see if liberal groups and users are being treated the same as those on the right. Social media companies operate in a black-box environment, only releasing anecdotes about reports on content and users when they think it necessary. This needs to change. The companies need to design open systems so that they can be held accountable, while giving weight to privacy concerns.

 

  1. Provide Clarity on ‘Hate Speech’: “Hate speech” is a common concern among social media companies, but no two firms define it the same way. Their definitions are vague and open to interpretation, and their interpretation often looks like an opportunity to silence thought. Today, hate speech means anything liberals don’t like. Silencing those you disagree with is dangerous. If companies can’t tell users clearly what it is, then they shouldn’t try to regulate it.

 

3 Provide Equal Footing for Conservatives: Top social media firms, such as Google and YouTube, have chosen to work with dishonest groups that are actively opposed to the conservative movement, including the Southern Poverty Law Center. Those companies need to make equal room for conservative groups as advisers to offset this bias. That same attitude should be applied to employment diversity efforts. Tech companies need to embrace viewpoint diversity.

 

  1. Mirror the First Amendment: Tech giants should afford their users nothing less than the free speech and free exercise of religion embodied in the First Amendment as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. That standard, the result of centuries of American jurisprudence, would enable the rightful blocking of content that threatens violence or spews obscenity, without trampling on free speech liberties that have long made the United States a beacon for freedom.