Anonymous ID: 50c887 Sept. 28, 2026, 12:41 p.m. No.25085513   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5529

>>25085505

Did you even bother to read what you originally replied to? I never said anything about judges not prosecuting cops… that's not what I was talking about.

 

Judges VIOLATE the US constitution regularly granting "qualified immunity" to cops using ignorance of the law as an excuse for cops and depriving the peoples 7th amendment right.

 

The courts unconstitutionally granted themselves and their thug enforcers immunity in direct violation of the constitution.

Anonymous ID: 50c887 Sept. 28, 2026, 12:55 p.m. No.25085545   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25085529

 

No, I didn't. I responded to the nonsense about a judge saying ignorance isn't an excuse. Judges LITERALLY consider it an excuse for "immunity" for cops/government employees.

 

Bradley v. Fisher, 80 US (13 Wall.) 335 (1872), the US Supreme Court created Judicial Immunity, a form of sovereign immunity, where judges cannot be sued for their judicial acts, even when done "maliciously and corruptly".

 

Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) the court created "qualified immunity" for cops, claiming that they should not face financial liability if they acted in good faith and with probable cause under a law they believed was valid at the time.

 

Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) the court expanded qualified immunity, eliminated the old subjective "good faith" element (which asked whether the official acted with malicious intent. Now government employes are shielded from civil damages liability unless their conduct violates "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."

 

They claim unless there is a previous case under similar circumstances where an officer was found to have violated rights by performing a specific action, then the officer could not "reasonably know" performing that action is a violation of rights.

 

Literally making ignorance of the law an excuse for cops. They only need think up new ways of torturing people.

 

And it ALL blatantly violates the 7th amendment, stopping a federal civil case before it makes it to a jury, because judges say so. Authority they were not only never granted, but specifically forbidden.

Anonymous ID: 50c887 Sept. 28, 2026, 1:24 p.m. No.25085644   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25085641

But it is True… you just don't like it. The Way, and the Truth, and the Life. Life is Truth is the Way.

 

When you eat the flesh and blood of LIFE, you eat His flesh and blood.

 

It was a hard teaching for those who thought the flesh "unclean" and/or "evil", created by a demiurge etc.