>>2508525 (lb)
>https://www.theepochtimes.com/media-attacks-do-little-to-sway-q-supporters.html
>>2508616
>>2508773
Interesting. Couldn't find any political activity under that name.
Not too many references at all. There's this. Same person?
If so, looks like you're correct, hasn't been a bartender for 10 years according to linkedin.
Nothin like taking the "profit motive" out of the equation to throw folks off the scent.
Speaking of frequencies, did anyone come up with the answer to this?
>>2495252 #3147 Why is Chuck Schumer so gung ho to save T-Band?
>WASHINGTON DC – Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Bob Casey (D-Penn.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) today introduced legislation, the Don’t Break Up the T-Band Act of 2018, that would repeal a provision of the 2012 Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act, which directs the FCC to auction the T-band spectrum (470–512 MHz) by 2021.
Quite a cast of characters there. Still trying to figure out who slipped that Section 6103 into the "Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012" and why.
For those who remember analog TV, this is UHF channels 14-20.
https://www.apcointl.org/spectrum-management/spectrum-management-resources/spectrum/frequencies-in-the-470-512-mhz-tv-band/
>In January, President Barack Obama announced his support for allocating the radio space, known as the D-block spectrum, to police and other emergency workers.
>Bills that would set aside the D-block and create a communications network have been introduced in both the House and the Senate this year but so far have not been passed in either chamber.
Good question. Article was dated 2011 and that T-Band section was made law in 2012.
Criminal how long it's taken to resolve this issue. Should have been one of the top 3 priorities after 9/11.