Anonymous ID: 1dc526 Oct. 1, 2026, 10:11 p.m. No.25097192   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7200

>>25097167

It means EXACTLY what it says.

 

The Supreme Court has made MANY blatantly unconstitutional RULINGS.

 

Just look at Judicial immunity and the 7th amendment.

 

Bradley v. Fisher, 80 US (13 Wall.) 335 (1872), the US Supreme Court created Judicial Immunity, a form of sovereign immunity, where judges cannot be sued for their judicial acts, even when done "maliciously and corruptly".

 

Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) the court created "qualified immunity" for cops, claiming that they should not face financial liability if they acted in good faith and with probable cause under a law they believed was valid at the time.

 

Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) the court expanded qualified immunity, eliminated the old subjective "good faith" element (which asked whether the official acted with malicious intent. Now government employes are shielded from civil damages liability unless their conduct violates "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."

 

They claim unless there is a previous case under similar circumstances where an officer was found to have violated rights by performing a specific action, then the officer could not "reasonably know" performing that action is a violation of rights.

 

Literally making ignorance of the law an excuse for cops. They only need think up new ways of torturing people.

 

And it ALL blatantly violates the 7th amendment, stopping a federal civil case before it makes it to a jury, because judges say it can never make it to a jury. Authority they were not only never granted, but specifically forbidden by the 7th amendment.

 

They may call it the Supreme Court, but We the People outrank them, and they have been in bad behavior and lawless for over 150 years.