=NEWS=
Dems falling short in string of tight contests, raising doubts about 'blue wave' predictions
www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/08/dems-hang-tough-in-safe-gop-districts-during-special-elections-but-victories-are-elusive.html
=NEWS=
Dems falling short in string of tight contests, raising doubts about 'blue wave' predictions
www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/08/dems-hang-tough-in-safe-gop-districts-during-special-elections-but-victories-are-elusive.html
I like this one betterโฆKek!
Excellent! Kek!
Who the fuck comes up with all these stupid fucking 'it's so-and-so day'?
Cabal trying to push more of their brainwashing shit?
Seems like it for damn sure!
Now that would be a hell of a good one!
Assumption.
He could testify by letter as well.
Do you think he is going to trust a government that is trying to jail him?
Someone walks up to you and says we'll cut a deal, will you trust them?
They want him badly, badly enough they would lie to him to flush him out.
5 for 5 is not the same as 5:5.
Don't assume they are the same.
Hope your right.
That is pure speculation.
If it were comms, he would have used 5:5
Instead he said '5 for 5', as in 5 of his selected candidates won, not 'roger, loud and clear'.
I'm just tired of this place getting hyped up and nothing happens.
Months of that shit tends to wear one down.
So, to me, 5 for 5 = the rallies he went to, those candidates won.
From your keyboard to god's eyes.
How is that possible if the sites are down and people can't get to them to subscribe?
Example of the hype, and it winds up being wrongly translated.
So 5:5 is a nothing burger that has no meaning what so ever, and has NOW by the power of anons, changed to 5 for 5.
Like I said, those 2 phrases have to completely different meanings.
All y'all are doing is hyping each other up for a big let down by the end of the day.