Anonymous ID: ecbb8e Oct. 5, 2026, 7:44 p.m. No.25110071   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0086

>>25109972

SI says nay.

 

No. The passage is a collection of false or unsupported “sovereign citizen” claims, mixed with misunderstandings of legal procedure.

 

The American Bar Association is not a “foreign union.” It is a U.S.-based voluntary professional association. Lawyers do not become foreign agents by joining it, and membership is not required to practice law in most jurisdictions. Attorneys are licensed by state or federal courts and are bound by applicable professional-conduct rules.

 

U.S. lawyers do not swear allegiance to the Queen of England. A lawyer’s admission oath is established by the relevant state or federal jurisdiction. It generally involves upholding the U.S. Constitution, the applicable state constitution, and the law—not allegiance to a foreign monarch.

 

A notice of appearance is not an admission of foreign-agent status. It simply tells the court and other parties that an attorney represents a particular person and identifies where court papers should be sent. The exact requirement varies by court. For example, Supreme Court Rule 9 describes an appearance as identifying counsel of record for a represented party. Cornell University

 

A notice of appearance does not create jurisdiction over the client. Jurisdiction comes from statutes, constitutional authority, the type of case, service of process, and other legally recognized grounds. A lawyer’s filing does not turn a court into a “corporate court” or convert the client into corporate property.

 

28 U.S.C. § 3002(15)(A) is being taken out of context. That provision says that, for purposes of that particular federal debt-collection chapter, “United States” includes a federal corporation, a federal agency, or an instrumentality of the United States. It does not say that the United States is secretly a foreign corporation, that courts are commercial businesses, or that attorneys are foreign agents. The statute expressly begins, “As used in this chapter.” Justia

 

The ABA is not a branch of the National Lawyers Guild or the Communist Party. Section 3002 contains no such statement. Its definitions include terms such as “counsel for the United States,” “court,” “debt,” “person,” and “United States”; none establishes the alleged relationship. Justia

 

There is no general rule requiring a prosecutor who loses a trial to personally pay prosecution costs. Criminal prosecutions are ordinarily brought by the government, and a verdict against the government does not ordinarily make the prosecutor personally liable. A prosecutor can face sanctions or professional consequences for misconduct, but that is entirely different from an automatic personal payment obligation.

 

The claim that defense attorneys routinely disclose defense strategies to prosecutors is contrary to attorney-client confidentiality rules. Lawyers generally must protect confidential client information, subject to limited exceptions. Deliberately revealing a client’s defense strategy to avoid a supposed personal penalty would ordinarily raise serious ethical and professional issues. The ABA’s professional standards describe defense counsel as the client’s representative and emphasize acting in the client’s best interests. UpCounsel

 

The passage’s method—reinterpreting ordinary words such as “corporation,” “appearance,” “power,” and “jurisdiction” as hidden legal codes—is not accepted by U.S. courts. Filing arguments based on these theories can lead to rejected pleadings, sanctions, missed deadlines, or default judgments. The legally meaningful questions are the specific court’s jurisdiction, its procedural rules, the attorney’s engagement agreement, and the applicable law—not whether a lawyer filed a notice of appearance.