Not always… as noted in that scripture. The Way, and the Truth, and the Life. Is Life Male only, or does it take male and female to produce more life?
>If those judges are corrupt
Every judge in the nation is corrupt… because the judicial itself is corrupt.
Bradley v. Fisher, 80 US (13 Wall.) 335 (1872), the US Supreme Court created Judicial Immunity, a form of sovereign immunity, where judges cannot be sued for their judicial acts, even when done "maliciously and corruptly".
Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) the court created "qualified immunity" for cops, claiming that they should not face financial liability if they acted in good faith and with probable cause under a law they believed was valid at the time. So, if they believed, from say a higher up or judge that an unconstitutional law was valid, they could not be held financially liable for enforcing that law and the violation of rights.
Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) the court expanded qualified immunity, eliminated the old subjective "good faith" element (which asked whether the official acted with malicious intent. Now government employees are shielded from civil damages liability unless their conduct violates "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."
The court claims unless there is a previous case under similar circumstances where an officer was found to have violated rights by performing a specific action, then the officer could not "reasonably know" performing that action is a violation of rights.
https://reason.com/2026/09/09/appeals-court-grants-immunity-to-texas-cops-who-held-handcuffed-woman-face-down-in-a-fire-ant-hill/
And it ALL blatantly violates the 7th amendment, stopping a federal civil case (suit at common law) before it makes it to a jury, because judges say it can never make it to a jury. Authority they were not only never granted, but specifically forbidden by the 7th amendment.