>>2511204 (lb)
I'm hoping they are right to be honest, but this time is different for some reason.
How many rallies did POTUS attend right before the elections lastnight? Was it 5? So 5 candidates that POTUS rallied for won lastnight.
Not a chance in hell POTUS was happy enough to tweet out '5 for 5' after that, eh?
I do see how they can see '5 for 5' as being 5:5.
But both of those are different meanings.
5 for 5 = IIIII out of IIIII
5:5 = Roger, message understood.
Oh for fucks sake…..
=NEWS=
Russia meddled in Ohio special election, TV star says
www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/08/08/alyssa-milano-accuses-russia-meddling-in-ohio-special-congressional-election.html
Kek!
Excuse me, but he didn't tweet 5:5.
He tweeted 5 FOR 5.
Big difference in menaing, unless your an hyped up anon trying to read something into it that's not there.
It was a simple victory lap considering he did 5 rallies and those he rallied for won.
Not here…it turns up being a blunt instead.
=NEWS=
Trump says primary triumphs show GOP poised to win November
www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/08/trump-predicts-giant-red-wave-claiming-fresh-victory-streak-for-endorsed-candidates.html
…and I thought BlockBuster closed it's doors…Kek!
Occam's razor
Occam's razor (also Ockham's razor or Ocham's razor; Latin: lex parsimoniae "law of parsimony") is the problem-solving principle that the simplest solution tends to be the right one. When presented with competing hypotheses to solve a problem, one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions. The idea is attributed to William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), who was an English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher, and theologian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor
Then you failed to grasp the whole concept of Occam's razor.
Go on, gaslight all the anons with your hype, and at the end of the day I'll be laughing my ass off because you tried to over examine a victory lap.
So AFTER JA testifies, we should start seeing some REAL fireworks.