Go to qmap.pub for Q posts.
All posts are also archived offline by GermanArchiveAnon on MEGA.
5 for 5 refers to Q's post 5:5. Trump is using a double message here. He's referring to the rallies, proving that in 5 out of 5 rallies reps won. On the other side, he refers to JA, the server and the still to be leaked HRC video (which will most likely be publicized by JA when he testifies).
Fucking hell. Just use qmap.pub
>If Trump wanted to say 5:5 why wouldn't he say that? Or even 5 by 5?
I can just shake my head at this statement. You really must be new here. It's clear as day why POTUS wouldn't directly quote Q with 5:5. You completely forget about the media? Or are you just desperately trying to shill?
Besides that, you are missing the point of double meanings I am making here. This is nothing new. Besides that, 5:5 has been confirmed before also, see Oval Office after shooting.
>You are reading things that are NOT in his text.
Pretty much proof that you are a newfag or seriously have no clue how comms work. Try harder. Timestamps also prove 5:5 statement. You lost.
What's worse is that this proof is nothing else than bullshit. Did Q ever claim that he posted the quote before Donald Trump? Nope, he didn't. Yet LeeFuckingRetardStan tries to disprove something by concluding from a false premise. Every math student knows: If the premise is false, the conclusion is also false. And that's exactly what happened in this video.
*disproval
You see right, anon.