US retaliates after being labeled disinformation threat in EU – media
Washington reportedly pressured governments over an event organized by an NGO that once branded critics of the French president “Russian bots”
Published 8 Oct, 2026 13:481/2
Washington has reportedly pressured several governments to withdraw their support for a conference organized by an EU-funded “anti-disinfo” NGOthat designated the US a potential source of foreign disinformation.
The event host is EU DisinfoLab, one of Brussels’ info-gatekeepers deployed to scapegoat and smear dissidents opposing the bloc’s political course. The NGO notoriously launched its career by labeling online critics of French President Emmanuel Macron as “Russophiles.”
Organizers of the #Disinfo2026 conferencein Vilnius, Lithuania, reportedly classified theUS as a “foreign information manipulation and interference” (FIMI) actor, according to two news outlets with insider sources in Brussels. The EU normally uses the term to describe alleged malicious online activities by geopolitical rivals such as Russia and China.
By the time the conference opened, the logos of the EU’s diplomatic service, the European External Action Service (EEAS), and the foreign ministries of Canada and Lithuaniahad disappeared from all material, leaving only the French Foreign Ministry and the Vilnius city administration.
Rapporteur, formerly known as Euractiv, attributed the changes to apressure campaign initiated by American writer Michael Shellenberger, who withdrew as a speaker after learning that the US had been designated a FIMI actor.
Politico cited the US State Department and cables instructing American embassies to convey Washington’s objections.
“Labeling the United States a ‘FIMI threat’ – a term normally reserved for describing influence operations of adversaries – undermines shared goals and should alarm those involved,”officials told the outlet.
Experts in (spreading) disinformation
The Russiagate hoax, involving a concerted campaign by former US President Barack Obama and his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, to falsely claim US President Donald Trump was somehow compromised by links to Russia, helped fuel the emergence of an industry of self-described experts in combating online disinformation and misinformation. Critics have accusedsuch organizations of serving as proxies for government-backed censorshipthat authorities cannot impose directly.
Belgium-based EU DisinfoLab first attracted widespread attention in 2018, when it alleged Russian efforts to amplify a political scandal involving Macron’s security aide, Alexandre Benalla, who had been filmed assaulting protesters while wearing police equipment.
The NGO’s research identified alleged “Russian bots” and “French Russophile” Twitter accounts supposedly fueling public outrage over the affair. Critics questioned its methodology, prompting the organization to publish detailed information about the accounts it had studied, including those of opposition politicians Jean-Luc Melenchon and Marine Le Pen.
In 2022, theBelgian Data Protection Authority (APD)fined EU DisinfoLab €2,700 ($3,000) and its lead researcher, Nicolas Vanderbiest, €1,200 ($1,300), while formally reprimanding both. The regulator, which investigated the case in cooperation with France’s data protection authority, the CNIL, found that the researchers hadunlawfully processed personal datarevealing political opinions and exposed users to potential discrimination through political profiling.
The decision prompted French National Rally MEP Virginie Joronto question whether EU DisinfoLab should continue receiving funding from Brussels. Grants allocated by the European Commission to the NGO over the years have added up to at least €1.4 million ($1.6 million), according to financial disclosures.
https://www.rt.com/news/646919-us-disinformation-conference-eu/