https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2018/03/02/the-real-russia-story-port-canaveral-project-pelican-and-uranium-one-deals-connected-through-the-jafars/
Anons, why does Project Pelican, the Obama administration's sale of our military secrets, get shilly responses from "authentic members of the qanon community"
namecalling, nothing else. How am I shilling? I'm pointing out corruption that patriots like yourself should be concerned about.
Who sells missiles to Russia, NK, and Saddam?
Who pollutes this board calling me a shill for humbly suggesting it be researched?
jesus christ.
Please link me to refutations. NYTimes also reported on related matters, such as Uranium One. I'm not the idiot you take me as, and I don't believe other readers are either. Hopefully posterity will provide justice.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=1
Please direct me to a board where people are interested in evidence furthering the investigations that q was originally proposing. I thought this was the main q board, but if you so brazenly attempt to shut down legitimate contributions, that clearly is not the case.
Also, qanon.pub is shut down. Did you do this too? You're glowing, anon.
SHARE THE FUCKING DEBUNKING THEN GOD DAMN.
I'm asking why it's baseless. I'm trying to reason with you. Quit just referring to a debunking that I've never seen. How is that helpful?
He mentions Uranium One, selling state secrets, treason. This relates to Obama giving access to a Paki shipping container company run by a blacklisted terrorist-supporter, and the subsequent selling of US Uranium to Russia.
Yeah, I know how to use the board and see my own responses you fuck.