>A federal judge…
Bradley v. Fisher, 80 US (13 Wall.) 335 (1872), the US Supreme Court created Judicial Immunity, a form of sovereign immunity, where judges cannot be sued for their judicial acts, even when done "maliciously and corruptly".
"I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL."
Bradley v. Fisher, 80 US (13 Wall.) 335 (1872), the US Supreme Court created Judicial Immunity, a form of sovereign immunity, where judges cannot be sued for their judicial acts, even when done "maliciously and corruptly".
Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) the court created "qualified immunity" for cops, claiming that they should not face financial liability if they acted in good faith and with probable cause under a law they believed was valid at the time. So, if they believed, from say a higher up or judge that an unconstitutional law was valid, they could not be held financially liable for violation of rights.
Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) the court expanded qualified immunity, eliminated the old subjective "good faith" element (which asked whether the official acted with malicious intent. Now government employees are shielded from civil damages liability unless their conduct violates "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."
The court claims unless there is a previous case under similar circumstances where an officer was found to have violated rights by performing a specific action, then the officer could not "reasonably know" performing that action is a violation of rights.
https://reason.com/2026/09/09/appeals-court-grants-immunity-to-texas-cops-who-held-handcuffed-woman-face-down-in-a-fire-ant-hill/
And it ALL blatantly violates the 7th amendment, stopping a federal civil case (suit at common law) before it makes it to a jury, because judges say it can never make it to a jury. Authority they were not only never granted, but specifically forbidden by the 7th amendment.
Well that was a fucking lie
I don't hate Jews. I also don't hate cops themselves… I hate their crimes and their "club" of lawlessness.
How many times do I have to tell you they're not bastards? They're domestic enemies.
>And if you prosecute crimes done by a or under a President, you are "damaging the integrity" of the Presidency. This according to the current president.
They'll still consent
>rapid compliance
>Two bodies of water were renamed
You ever notice the "Tyrrhenian Sea" is off the coast of Italy… rather than Tyre?
You ever notice in the bible the god talks to the king of Tyre like he's satan himself?
It's amazing how easy bodies of water, cities, or countries can be renamed with "authority".
Once could change history.
"Future proves past"
>his enemy
>it loses the right
What part of unalienable do you not understand?
There's nothing civil about the death penalty.
“Son of man, say to the ruler of Tyre, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says:
“‘In the pride of your heart
you say, “I am a god;
I sit on the throne of a god
in the heart of the seas.”
But you are a mere mortal and not a god,
though you think you are as wise as a god.
3 Are you wiser than Daniel[a]?
Is no secret hidden from you?
4 By your wisdom and understanding
you have gained wealth for yourself
and amassed gold and silver
in your treasuries.
5 By your great skill in trading
you have increased your wealth,
and because of your wealth
your heart has grown proud.
6 “‘Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says:
“‘Because you think you are wise,
as wise as a god,
7 I am going to bring foreigners against you,
the most ruthless of nations;
they will draw their swords against your beauty and wisdom
and pierce your shining splendor.
8 They will bring you down to the pit,
and you will die a violent death
in the heart of the seas.
9 Will you then say, “I am a god,”
in the presence of those who kill you?
You will be but a mortal, not a god,
in the hands of those who slay you.
10 You will die the death of the uncircumcised
at the hands of foreigners.
I have spoken, declares the Sovereign Lord.’”
11 The word of the Lord came to me: 12 “Son of man, take up a lament concerning the king of Tyre and say to him: ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says:
“‘You were the seal of perfection,
full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
13You were in Eden,
the garden of God;
every precious stone adorned you:
carnelian, chrysolite and emerald,
topaz, onyx and jasper,
lapis lazuli, turquoise and beryl.[b]
Your settings and mountings[c] were made of gold;
on the day you were created they were prepared.
14 You were anointed as a guardian cherub,
for so I ordained you.
You were on the holy mount of God;
you walked among the fiery stones.
15 You were blameless in your ways
from the day you were created
till wickedness was found in you.
16 Through your widespread trade
you were filled with violence,
and you sinned.
So I drove you in disgrace from the mount of God,
and I expelled you, guardian cherub,
from among the fiery stones.
17 Your heart became proud
on account of your beauty,
and you corrupted your wisdom
because of your splendor.
So I threw you to the earth;
I made a spectacle of you before kings.
18 By your many sins and dishonest trade
you have desecrated your sanctuaries.
So I made a fire come out from you,
and it consumed you,
and I reduced you to ashes on the ground
in the sight of all who were watching.
19 All the nations who knew you
are appalled at you;
you have come to a horrible end
and will be no more.’”
KMAO No.
Removing the "violator" makes you a violator.
Color of ANY law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom.
Tell me… why are you so pro law when it comes to the death penalty… but have ignored government violating the 7th amendment and giving itself immunity?
>life is not constitutionally protected
Read the declaration of independence and the 9th amendment.
The US is the land of hypocrisy and double standards.
Yet you support the taking of life with the death penalty.
An eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth leads to everyone being blind and toothless. The death penalty is not civil… it simply feeds the blood lust of violent people.
"Common"
Not only. Every person has the right to life according to our declaration of independence. Killing someone for a crime is deprivation of rights under color of law.
You mean like taking authority never granted, giving or accepting civil immunity in violation of the US constitution?
Never said it was.
But killing a murderer, unless an active threat, is not "civil". Life in prison is.
And the people didn't grant authority for government to violate their God given constitutionally protected rights but they're still doing it.
Like I said earlier… an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth leads to everyone being blind and toothless.
Depriving the right to life under color of law for your blood lust is not moral.
Do you want Nidal Hasan executed? Or anyone else?
Yes, it is. You don't get to decide that.
>but wipe your feet first
"If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, leave that home or town and shake the dust off your feet."
LMAO
We the People also placed limits on government that are violated daily.
Is treason punishable by death?
I agree… under 18 U.S. Code § 2381 the penalty for treason is death.
What do you call judges giving themselves and government employees (cops) civil immunity in violation of our 4th amendment?
What do you call gun control in violation of our 2nd amendment.
How many wars has the United States been involved in since the last time congress declared war June 5, 1942? Who has SOLE authority to declare war according to the US constitution?
>the other side of time
The first is last and the last is first.
As it was in the days of Noah, so it shall be at the coming of the Son of Man.
"When evening comes, you say, 'It will be fair weather, for the sky is red,' and in the morning, 'Today it will be stormy, for the sky is red and overcast.' You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs of the times.'"