Scott Jennings Breaks the Brains of CNN Panelists by Asking a Simple Question About the SAVE America Act (VIDEO)

Mike LaChance Oct. 10, 2026

Scott Jennings recently caused a total meltdown from his fellow CNN panelists by asking a simple question.

Democrat strategist Alencia Jonson was talking about the SAVE America Act and repeatedly claimed that it would ‘take voting rights away’ from black people and others. Scott simply asked, “how?”

Naturally, she can’t give Scott an answer, so she filibusters by repeating the claim, and Jennings keeps asking, “how?”

Host Abby Phillip then rides in to rescue the liberal panelist like she always does and things get even crazier from there.

Partial transcript via Twitter/X:

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “[Trump] is championing a bill that would take voting rights away from a lot of black people in this country.”

JENNINGS: “Wait, what voting rights is he taking away from black voters?”

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “Oh, if we look at the SAVE Act… That is actually going to continue to disenfranchise overwhelmingly a lot of people of color.”

JENNINGS: “How?”

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “There are so many civil rights organizations that have run the data. If we look at the way that it is going to disenfranchise black voters.”

JENNINGS: “How?”

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “It’s the same reason why Chuck Schumer called it Jim Crow 2.0.”

JENNINGS: “You haven’t said how yet!”

“76% of black voters think we should show an ID to vote, 80% of Hispanic voters, 83% of the American people. Are you saying that black voters are too dumb to know what’s good for them? It sounds pretty condescending to me!”

Watch the clip below:

Whatever CNN is paying Scott Jennings, it isn’t nearly enough

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/10/scott-jennings-breaks-brains-cnn-panelists-asking-simple/

Judge strikes down DOJ's policy of reviewing state voter rolls, saying it would "run roughshod over longstanding laws" 1/2

By Jacob Rosen

Updated on: October 9, 2026 /

(The next thing the Trump Admin has to do is get rid of stupid and corrupt Judges appointed by Obama, Biden and all the lying leftists that were Presidents. What longstanding laws is this guy quoting. It’s all propaganda, that stupid leftists believe.)

A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration's plan to check state voter rolls against federal immigration databases, a blow to the administration's election-related efforts in the run-up to the midterms.

In a 78-pageruling, D.C.-based U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan wrote Friday that the Justice Department "cannot run roughshod over longstanding laws that were carefully crafted to protect the rights of the American people."

The Trump administration has mounted a nationwide push to obtain complete voter rolls from every state, including sensitive information about registered voters. The Justice Department has argued the information is needed to ensure states are complying with two federal voting laws — the Help America Vote Act and the National Voter Registration Act — which aim to ensure states have programs in place for maintaining accurate voter rolls.

Eighteen states fully cooperated with the Justice Department's request for voter files, Sooknanan said.The department has brought lawsuits against most other states, and has lost almost all of the suits, according to a CBS News analysis. One state settled with the federal government.

The ruling applies to the voter files that the Justice Department has already received, as well as the files it is still litigating over.

Sooknanan rejected the Justice Department's argument that it has legal authority to demand voter lists, compare those lists against citizenship databases and urge states to remove voters who it claims are ineligible to vote. The judge also said the policy violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Privacy Act, and said the federal databases could contain "inaccuracies."

"Today's decision does not prevent the federal government from taking lawful steps to support states' efforts to maintain accurate voter rolls. Neither does it prevent states from maintaining their own voter rolls. And to state the obvious, the Court's decision does not pave the way for ineligible voters to vote in our elections," Sooknanan wrote.

“Rather, the Court vacates a policy that has removed United States citizens from the voter rolls in their home states and risks disenfranchising many more — a policy that flies in the face of duly enacted laws designed to protect Americans."

She continued: "The challenged policy represents the federal government's attempt to decide who gets to vote. But Congress has left that authority where our Constitution has always placed it: with the states." (All the Trump Admin is doing is preventing non voters that don’t have the right to vote, “can’t cheat in elections.)

The legal challenge against the voter roll policy was brought byadvocacy group Common Causeand individual voters.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-blocks-doj-state-voter-roll-policy-civil-rights/

>>25129657

2/2

Common Cause CEO Virginia Kase Solomón called the ruling "a victory for voters and yet another loss for the Department of Justice" in a statement Friday.

A Justice Department spokesperson said the agency is reviewing the decision.

Under the Trump administration, the federal government has sought a larger-than-usual role in elections, which are typically administered by states with some regulation by Congress.

President Trump argues more federal scrutiny is necessary in order to prevent noncitizens from voting and curb fraud —though most election experts say fraud and noncitizen voting are extremely rare.(which is not true, there’s a huge amount of cheating, as proven by the 2020 false election)

The government's push to run state voter rolls through the Department of Homeland Security's Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database has faced court setbacks,as more than two dozen judges have denied the Justice Department's requests to compel individual states to share their voter lists.(there are 100s if not 1,000s of judges in the U.S., so 24 judges are not the majority)

Sooknanan also ruled in June that the Trump administration's overhauled SAVE database — which includes data from the Social Security Administration — was created unlawfully. The Supreme Court temporarily paused that ruling last month.

In practice, the impact of recent court rulings on the November midterms could be limited as federal law bars states from systematically removing ineligible voters from their voter registration lists within 90 days of an election.

Another Trump administration policy that set new rules for the U.S. Postal Service's handling of mail-in ballots was also blocked in the courts, with the Supreme Court declining the government's request to allow the rules to take effect.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-blocks-doj-state-voter-roll-policy-civil-rights/