Previous Bread:

>>2513508

You are missing the point. There are those that will never believe the entire narrative unless Q is proven to be truthful. Q is the one that has made the statements. Q is the one that has made the claims. Q is the one that, unless it is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt is a real person (either working with or actually is POTUS), then this whole thing will not be taken as truth by MANY people. It's why he asked us to get proofs together.

Think!

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/16943.html#17474

>Less than 10 can confirm ME

Not us, ME

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2392721.html#2393006

>Who is the one person who can answer?

>POTUS.

Wake up, anon. Q wants this. Get your proofs ready. This will be pivotal. It's why Q said that about 4-6% will always be lost. Even after getting the irrefutable proof from POTUS, they will still deny it.

>>2513688

>How would Q be 'proven to be truthful', when he has said 'disinformation is necessary'.?

You're taking this out of context, but "persuasion" is the answer if you really are seeking it.

>You are believing and hoping in something that can, by definition, NEVER come true.

You cannot know that to be true in and of itself. You are making a baseless assumption.

>Marxism will be classified as a mental disease And they will all be placed in the mental hospital In Antarctica.

Don't get my hopes up, anon.

>>2513747

Sorry, also mean to link here:

>>2513672

>>2513797

TY. All Q wants is to be proven true. He wants it because it will literally force them to prove EVERY accusation they've made since Oct 28th.

>>1953310

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1952753.html#1953310

I personally CANNOT WAIT to see the look on certain people's faces when we anons are proven right. We also have a GREAT RESPONSIBILITY to be there and help them understand when their minds BREAK from the truth being revealed.

Think about that for when the time comes.

>>2513922

Right? I'm stuck on this Q quote for the day:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1952753.html#1953310

I think we need to keep posting it in our responses to the concernshills.

>>2514141

That would be interesting, but keep in mind the context of Q's response. It was in response to this:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1952036.html#1952748

Which was in direct response to this:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1952036.html#1952583

Get why anons spent weeks pushing the WH Press Corps to ask the question? I remember when I posted all their twitter accounts. Thought for a minute that John Gizzi was going to do something with it, then he backed off.

We're watching a movie, remember? It'll be done when POTUS wants it, by whom he wants the question asked by. But it's going to happen for sure!