Excuse me for the reflux but we've been asked to digest and understand this lawful weaponization of the media by past administration.
In light of what's happening it seems a visionary wise move on their behalf… BUT … they never thought she'd lose! So, what's the deal here, what's the gig?
What were they on about? What was the (their) plan? Do we know? Have we thought this through already? (I mean at a deeper level than the rationale given in HR5181 or subsequent paper). Anyone still working on this?